Jump to content


FCP Euro

- - - - -

Dyno Results


64 replies to this topic

#21 laird

    Level 3 Member

  • Lifetime Supporter
  • 1,381 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kaysville, Utah
  • Crew:___

Posted 27 November 2008 - 05:46 PM

QUOTE (turbotuner @ Nov 27 2008, 02:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I wasn't just talking about all the mechanical bits "being" there, I was talking about them being setup correctly. Have you had the engine apart or changed the cam-belt? Are the cams setup ok? Is the turbo contol working ok? Is the turbo itself ok? Are all the sensors working ok? etc.

First you should check the boost level at high rpms by bypassing the ECU boost control. If it won't hold boost with an EBC or MBC etc, then it doesn't matter what you do - you will never get the power.

I had the engine apart to install the rods and pistons and the cams are where they are supposed to be. Compression is 160 across the board. I have used another TCV and have used an MBC. I don't really know what Sensors I should be looking at. I have wondered if the Knock sensors could be TU but other than that, where do I look. The 19T was brand new when I installed it last year. I have taken out the CBV and found it to be fine. If I stay out of WOT, not hitting the kickdown, I get all kinds of boost but at WOT, it imediately drops. I will wire the wastgate closed if needs be to figure out if I can make boost. Other than the tune, I am out of answers.
Posted Image
1997 850 R, 1998 S70 GLT, 1998 S70 NA (parts car), 1999 S70 NA, 1998 V70 NA, 1969 MGC.

#22 EricF

    tbricks spy

  • OH Moderator
  • 4,159 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hollywood, FL
  • Crew:LBC

Posted 27 November 2008 - 05:54 PM

What is your cam timing set at?

Those air/fuel ratios are very poor, but sometimes you get strange readings when cars are on dynos with certain tunes.. However, the timing is horrendous. All those short wavelength-looking variations are the timing just being horrifically off and the ECU adjusting and the engine reacting as best it can. I would first be interested to see where the cams are set at, and ask RICA what they recommend. Also, who did you buy your tune from? (I hate to ask, but I have to)

If it's George, hopefully you can work something out for a re-tune with RICA, show them the dyno chart, tell them it's a freshly rebuilt engine that runs perfectly with a lot of new components, and their tune is absolutely unacceptable. You just have a 19T, they should be able to give you an accurate tune for that.
Posted Image
1984 244 GLT - blue rat rod (SOLD!)
1995 850 turbo - Turbonetics CBB T3/T04E, M56H, KW V2, VEMS Standalone, not as shitty as it looks! (I sell to you for good price?)

"Fish, I love you and respect you very much. But I will kill you dead before this day ends." -Santiago

#23 turbotuner

    Level 1 Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 206 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Crew:___

Posted 27 November 2008 - 06:10 PM

QUOTE (laird @ Nov 27 2008, 05:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I had the engine apart to install the rods and pistons and the cams are where they are supposed to be. Compression is 160 across the board. I have used another TCV and have used an MBC. I don't really know what Sensors I should be looking at. I have wondered if the Knock sensors could be TU but other than that, where do I look. The 19T was brand new when I installed it last year. I have taken out the CBV and found it to be fine. If I stay out of WOT, not hitting the kickdown, I get all kinds of boost but at WOT, it imediately drops. I will wire the wastgate closed if needs be to figure out if I can make boost. Other than the tune, I am out of answers.


If you have used an MBC and it's still not holding boost, then that indicates some problem with flow, either caused by a restriction, or by a leak, or cam timing etc.

If for whatever reason the ECU is seeing less load than it's supposed to, then ignition timing will also be out since timing at lower loads is set higher than timing for higher loads. Fueling will also be affected by load.

Does it hold boost at part throttle in the high rpm?

In terms of the map, it's perfectly normal for it to take several attempts for a good custom tune, especially with the other engine mods you have done. Don't expect it to be right first time - that's part and parcel of custom tuning. The good thing is that you have collected dyno data so that things can be adjusted accordingly, rather than just guessing. Good data logging is the key to a successful tune!

Edited by turbotuner, 27 November 2008 - 06:34 PM.

Turbo-Tuner USB - DIY Tuning for Volvo Bosch Motronic 4.3 and 4.4
http://www.turbo-tuner.co.uk
http://support.turbo-tuner.co.uk

#24 lookforjoe

    Level 5 Member

  • Lifetime Supporter
  • 7,810 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Making Stuff
  • Location:New York
  • Crew:NEC

Posted 27 November 2008 - 07:28 PM

QUOTE (laird @ Nov 27 2008, 12:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If you read the albeit poor chart, you will see that the 222HP came at 13psi. Which by the way, proves a long standing argument that no matter the size of the turbo, the same level of boost will provide the same level of power all other things being equal.


I think that's only true in the optimal operating window for the specific turbo - since once you move above that, you're pushing hot air instead - 18psi on a 16T will not give the same output as 18psi on A 19T
Posted Image
1998 V70 XR M66 10cm2Hotside/Garrett 60-1 Built T5 Motor '03 Ported Head EnemY21Cams TurboTuner 710cc Inj, DP back Dual Magnaflow 14834's May 2011 355WHP(@6400rpm) 347WTq(@4400rpm)@22psi Now with LGSpeed Header & Custom Intake Manifold! BIG 31x12x3"FMIC Currently sporting a vented piston!!!

#25 laird

    Level 3 Member

  • Lifetime Supporter
  • 1,381 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kaysville, Utah
  • Crew:___

Posted 28 November 2008 - 01:04 AM

The car will hold boost at part throttle.. all the way to redline. I fully expect to need a couple of shots at the tune to get it right, that's why I went to the dyno.
The cam timing is set to stock specs.
Using an MBC (even bypassing the TCV entirely) raises the overall boost levels but still, WOT at redline drops to 15psi.
The RICA tune in fact came from George, theoretically, he set it up for my current setup. I am willing to deal with RICA directly and send the ECU to Holland if that will help, it seems George has gone missing.



Posted Image
1997 850 R, 1998 S70 GLT, 1998 S70 NA (parts car), 1999 S70 NA, 1998 V70 NA, 1969 MGC.

#26 Chilled Man

    MILFSPEED

  • Gold Member
  • 29,897 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Demo Sawing your Volvos Up
  • Location:( . Y . )
  • Crew:NEC

Posted 28 November 2008 - 01:09 AM

QUOTE (lookforjoe @ Nov 27 2008, 02:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think that's only true in the optimal operating window for the specific turbo - since once you move above that, you're pushing hot air instead - 18psi on a 16T will not give the same output as 18psi on A 19T

I can personally attest to that

18psi on a 16t feels like 16psi on a 19t

there is a huge difference
2004 V70XC 2001 S60 T5M 1998 C70T5 M56 1998 S70T5 M56

#27 turbotuner

    Level 1 Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 206 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Crew:___

Posted 28 November 2008 - 01:39 AM

QUOTE (laird @ Nov 28 2008, 01:04 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The car will hold boost at part throttle.. all the way to redline. The cam timing is set to stock specs.


In that case it probably just needs a map tweak. The more detailed info you give them, the better the results will be. Good luck and hope you get it sorted.

Edited by turbotuner, 28 November 2008 - 01:47 AM.

Turbo-Tuner USB - DIY Tuning for Volvo Bosch Motronic 4.3 and 4.4
http://www.turbo-tuner.co.uk
http://support.turbo-tuner.co.uk

#28 Yellow95

    Level 5 Member

  • Lifetime Supporter
  • 5,343 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Porn and pork skins
  • Location:Warner Robins Georgia
  • Crew:___

Posted 28 November 2008 - 01:23 PM

QUOTE (laird @ Nov 27 2008, 12:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If you read the albeit poor chart, you will see that the 222HP came at 13psi. Which by the way, proves a long standing argument that no matter the size of the turbo, the same level of boost will provide the same level of power all other things being equal.


That is funny. I was just telling Hussein that the funniest shit aI had ever read on this board was about 3 years ago. Kevin was telling a guy that 15lbs from a 15G was different then 15lbs from an 18T. I laughed so hard I almost pissed my pants. I knew right then that i had to sign up on VS. Thats like saying a 12 ounce can of Heineken holds more beer then a 12 ounce can of Miller.wink.gif

Gary


QUOTE (Lil-Bo-Peep @ Nov 27 2008, 08:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I can personally attest to that

18psi on a 16t feels like 16psi on a 19t

there is a huge difference


Justin, If you make me piss my pants........wink.gif

1998 S70 T-5M, 1996 854 Turbo, 1998 V70 T-5M SOLD, 1998 V70 T-5A SOLD, 1996 854 Turbo SOLD, 1993 244 SOLD, 1991 244 SOLD, 1998 V70 T-5M (18T) SOLD, 1985 245 Turbo SCRAPPED, 1982 245 Turbo SOLD, 1997 854 GLT (16T) SOLD,1995 854 Turbo (18T) SOLD, 1997 855 T-5 SOLD, 1996 854 TLA (18T) SOLD

#29 Zaitz

    Level 3 Member

  • Supporting Member
  • 1,829 posts
  • Location:St. Paul, MN
  • Crew:___

Posted 28 November 2008 - 01:48 PM

Gary, I really think that is a true statement. The smaller turbo is going to heat the air much more at higher boost, making it less dense. The larger compressor on the 19t is going to heat the air less. Cooler temperatures = more dense air. This should translate to more power.

#30 shanehutton

    Level 2 Member

  • Lifetime Supporter
  • 947 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto (Canada)
  • Crew:___

Posted 28 November 2008 - 01:55 PM

Yep, boost going into the engine will be the same psi but the smaller turbo (if out of it's range) will have heated the air so much that it causes the ecu to back off due to detonation. In this case, the 19T would deliver more power (but not really more boost).

Same reason a car has more power on a cold day then a really hot day.
Posted Image

'00 S70 SE (slow/sold)
'98 S70 T5 SE A (wishes it was M)
Stage 0 | IPD R.I.P | ST stage2 | OBX 3/2.5 | Eibach springs | Koni adj. | IPD 25mm rear sway | Tombone endlinks | EST strut bar | Poly mounts | HID w/Ecode

#31 Yellow95

    Level 5 Member

  • Lifetime Supporter
  • 5,343 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Porn and pork skins
  • Location:Warner Robins Georgia
  • Crew:___

Posted 28 November 2008 - 02:02 PM

QUOTE (Zaitz @ Nov 28 2008, 08:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Gary, I really think that is a true statement. The smaller turbo is going to heat the air much more at higher boost, making it less dense. The larger compressor on the 19t is going to heat the air less. Cooler temperatures = more dense air. This should translate to more power.


I agree at the maximum effeciency range of the smaller turbo, but is 7 lbs of boost from an 18T different then 7lbs of boost from a 13G? I also truly hope that everyone understands that heat is a byproduct of compressing air regardless of the size of the turbo. There is no turbo out there that doesnt heat the charge while compressing it. I have had a 13G, 15G, 16T and 3 18T's and my buttometer can tell no difference at 15lbs of boost from any of them (excluding the 13G as I never went that high with boost) except that the 15G and 16T faded quicker.

Gary


QUOTE (shanehutton @ Nov 28 2008, 08:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yep, boost going into the engine will be the same psi but the smaller turbo (if out of it's range) will have heated the air so much that it causes the ecu to back off due to detonation. In this case, the 19T would deliver more power (but not really more boost).

Same reason a car has more power on a cold day then a really hot day.


Exactly how it should be said. Not "15lbs of boost on an 18T is different then 15lbs of boost an a 15G."

G

1998 S70 T-5M, 1996 854 Turbo, 1998 V70 T-5M SOLD, 1998 V70 T-5A SOLD, 1996 854 Turbo SOLD, 1993 244 SOLD, 1991 244 SOLD, 1998 V70 T-5M (18T) SOLD, 1985 245 Turbo SCRAPPED, 1982 245 Turbo SOLD, 1997 854 GLT (16T) SOLD,1995 854 Turbo (18T) SOLD, 1997 855 T-5 SOLD, 1996 854 TLA (18T) SOLD

#32 Zaitz

    Level 3 Member

  • Supporting Member
  • 1,829 posts
  • Location:St. Paul, MN
  • Crew:___

Posted 28 November 2008 - 02:09 PM

QUOTE (Yellow95 @ Nov 28 2008, 08:02 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I agree at the maximum effeciency range of the smaller turbo, but is 7 lbs of boost from an 18T different then 7lbs of boost from a 13G? I also truly hope that everyone understands that heat is a byproduct of compressing air regardless of the size of the turbo. There is no turbo out there that doesnt heat the charge while compressing it. I have had a 13G, 15G, 16T and 3 18T's and my buttometer can tell no difference at 15lbs of boost from any of them (excluding the 13G as I never went that high with boost) except that the 15G and 16T faded quicker.

Gary




Exactly how it should be said. Not "15lbs of boost on an 18T is different then 15lbs of boost an a 15G."

G

I think it's more of an issue at high boost, according to Corky Bell. You may also need a larger compressor to exemplify the difference. I am running 15psi right now and it feels loads faster than 15psi on the other two 850R's we have. I have more mods, but the difference is pretty large. I think the wagon is actually at 17psi and the 15psi from the 20g definitely feels stronger. A hell of a lot stronger, especially up top. Here is the quote from Maximum Boost, "With a small turbo, the maximum efficiency point peaks early, and temperatures will be lowest at low boost pressures. To keep temperatures down at high power outputs, a large turbo is clearly necessary. As the maximum efficiency point occurs at higher and higher rpm, cooler temperatures also occur. Cooler temperatures mean denser air, which keeps torque peaks at higher rpm."

#33 TorqueSteer

    Pretty Boy Racing

  • Supporting Member
  • 4,231 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Florida
  • Crew:___

Posted 28 November 2008 - 04:54 PM

If you are comparing the td04 family of turbos, sure there wont be much of a different between them at 10 psi. But I can tell you for a fact that when I ran my td05 super16g at 9psi, it was much more powerful than the td04-16t at 9psi. I The same for 13psi, 17psi, and 20 psi. I wont attribute this to a cooler intake charge, but simply because the exhaust housing was larger, and I opened up a bottleneck. So yes, two different turbos can deliver two different power levels at the same psi.
1995 850 Turbo | Hahn Racecraft Td05-Super 16g Turbo | 3" turboback exhaust | Water/ Methanol Injection | Custom FMIC | NA Cams | HKS SSQV BOV | Civinco Piggyback EMS | Walbro 255 LPH Fuel Pump | Innovate LM-1 A/F Meter | Koni Coilovers | QBM Endlinks | IPD Sway Bars | Profec B EBC | Bi-xenon Projector Retrofit | Matte Red Paint Finish.

...Sold for something American and RWD.

#34 nolanator

    Level 3 Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,461 posts
  • Interests:automotive mechanics, fitness, and mixed martial arts
  • Location:Oxnard, California
  • Crew:SCC

Posted 28 November 2008 - 05:52 PM

can unsprung weight such as heavy wheels and tires affect dyno results?

#35 loseR99

    Level 2 Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 644 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Atlanta, GA
  • Crew:CFL

Posted 28 November 2008 - 06:48 PM

QUOTE (nolanator @ Nov 28 2008, 12:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
can unsprung weight such as heavy wheels and tires affect dyno results?


Not as much as on the streets or track. Probably insignificant on the dyno. I'm not saying rolling on 20's would not have an effect. But plus sized wheels and tires in 17" or 18" will probably not be noticeable.

Posted Image

1999 V70R AWD FWD - Laser Blue - IPD polys, SharpHIDs, Eggcrate, TKI Endlinks, Marshall Instruments LED boost gauge, SNABB Pipe, Stylin Intercooler Hoses

2001 Volvo S40 1.9T - heavily modded 250hp 300ftlb - SOLD and missed often.



#36 nolanator

    Level 3 Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,461 posts
  • Interests:automotive mechanics, fitness, and mixed martial arts
  • Location:Oxnard, California
  • Crew:SCC

Posted 28 November 2008 - 06:50 PM

QUOTE (1clean01 @ Nov 28 2008, 10:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Not as much as on the streets or track. Probably insignificant on the dyno. I'm not saying rolling on 20's would not have an effect. But plus sized wheels and tires in 17" or 18" will probably not be noticeable.


the reason i ask is because i recently found out that my chrome perfos weigh in a whopping 40+ pounds. that's pretty much ridiculous given the average 16" wheel weighs what...like 18-21lbs. might as well be rolling on 20s...i hate these wheels

#37 Yellow95

    Level 5 Member

  • Lifetime Supporter
  • 5,343 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Porn and pork skins
  • Location:Warner Robins Georgia
  • Crew:___

Posted 28 November 2008 - 07:13 PM

QUOTE (TorqueSteer @ Nov 28 2008, 11:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If you are comparing the td04 family of turbos, sure there wont be much of a different between them at 10 psi. But I can tell you for a fact that when I ran my td05 super16g at 9psi, it was much more powerful than the td04-16t at 9psi. I The same for 13psi, 17psi, and 20 psi. I wont attribute this to a cooler intake charge, but simply because the exhaust housing was larger, and I opened up a bottleneck. So yes, two different turbos can deliver two different power levels at the same psi.


So it came on quicker...........

1998 S70 T-5M, 1996 854 Turbo, 1998 V70 T-5M SOLD, 1998 V70 T-5A SOLD, 1996 854 Turbo SOLD, 1993 244 SOLD, 1991 244 SOLD, 1998 V70 T-5M (18T) SOLD, 1985 245 Turbo SCRAPPED, 1982 245 Turbo SOLD, 1997 854 GLT (16T) SOLD,1995 854 Turbo (18T) SOLD, 1997 855 T-5 SOLD, 1996 854 TLA (18T) SOLD

#38 rynodyno312

    Level 2 Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 595 posts
  • Location:California

Posted 28 November 2008 - 07:24 PM

QUOTE (nolanator @ Nov 28 2008, 10:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
the reason i ask is because i recently found out that my chrome perfos weigh in a whopping 40+ pounds. that's pretty much ridiculous given the average 16" wheel weighs what...like 18-21lbs. might as well be rolling on 20s...i hate these wheels


That has to be with tires. No way perfos weigh 40lbs by themselves.
2000 S70 T5A Nautic Blue

#39 TorqueSteer

    Pretty Boy Racing

  • Supporting Member
  • 4,231 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Florida
  • Crew:___

Posted 28 November 2008 - 08:18 PM

QUOTE (Yellow95 @ Nov 28 2008, 02:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So it came on quicker...........


Nope, the turbo actually spools slower. Once the boost was built and I was holding 9 psi, the pull was harder, to me thats more power.
1995 850 Turbo | Hahn Racecraft Td05-Super 16g Turbo | 3" turboback exhaust | Water/ Methanol Injection | Custom FMIC | NA Cams | HKS SSQV BOV | Civinco Piggyback EMS | Walbro 255 LPH Fuel Pump | Innovate LM-1 A/F Meter | Koni Coilovers | QBM Endlinks | IPD Sway Bars | Profec B EBC | Bi-xenon Projector Retrofit | Matte Red Paint Finish.

...Sold for something American and RWD.

#40 loseR99

    Level 2 Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 644 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Atlanta, GA
  • Crew:CFL

Posted 28 November 2008 - 08:43 PM

QUOTE (nolanator @ Nov 28 2008, 01:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
the reason i ask is because i recently found out that my chrome perfos weigh in a whopping 40+ pounds. that's pretty much ridiculous given the average 16" wheel weighs what...like 18-21lbs. might as well be rolling on 20s...i hate these wheels


That does seem ridiculously heavy. I could understand them being 20-25 lbs a piece, with tire and air'd up probably 35-40lbs, but that's wheel and tire. My enkei & toyo combo weighs in at about 33lbs total, but then again, i've also got 4 lug nuts and a 4cyl, not 5 lug bolts and a 5cyl (not that they're at all related, haha). Not sure what my dad's S60 T5 wheels weigh, he's got continentals on Voxx MG's. I know his oem Tethys (is that right...Tethys?) weighed a good bit, over 20lbs a piece.

Posted Image

1999 V70R AWD FWD - Laser Blue - IPD polys, SharpHIDs, Eggcrate, TKI Endlinks, Marshall Instruments LED boost gauge, SNABB Pipe, Stylin Intercooler Hoses

2001 Volvo S40 1.9T - heavily modded 250hp 300ftlb - SOLD and missed often.







1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



IPD
Copyright 2012 Volvospeed