No would make it worse.

3" Or 2.5" Full Exo System?
#21
Posted 03 May 2005 - 07:12 PM
No would make it worse.

Volvospeed On Google+
.:: V70R : 30Forty50 : XC Forums ::.
#22 Guest_DougK_*
Posted 03 May 2005 - 07:26 PM
#23
Posted 03 May 2005 - 08:31 PM
So I must say I am very confused by this post. I have never seen so many different opions on this subject. I am going tonight to my friends muffler shop to have my turbo to tip exhaust made. I was planning to have him make some extra kits,to see if anyone is interested. my car is a 94 850turbo. I was going with a 3" down pipe 3" flexpipe,3" hi flow cat,3" magnaflow.and full 3" madrel bent aluminumized pipe for around $600.00. is this the best way to go if I plan to stay with my 15g and getting a chip,or reprogam,or what ever you want to call it.
1982 242ti being sold (moving on to fwd)
1994 854 turbo (project 850 with the help of volvo speed)
2007 saturn sky redline (coming july of 06)
#24
Posted 03 May 2005 - 10:07 PM
Which turbo are you referring to 15g? 16T? (or are they the same connection on that side??)
I find it pretty interesting that maybe a 3" down pipe isnt going to net us any gains (maybe just a change to a race cat and free flowing 2.5 exhaust is enough) *getting revised ideas*
Edited by GShyneDM, 03 May 2005 - 10:09 PM.
SpeedTuning 17PSI - MSD 6A - 3" Back - Sunglasses
#25
Posted 03 May 2005 - 11:07 PM
I have a stock turbo, and I had the IPD exhaust installed and have a 17 psi chip, I do want to upgrade my downpipe, is tha 3' the way to go?..like the one that Mike or Jesse are selling?
#26
Posted 03 May 2005 - 11:50 PM
#27
Posted 04 May 2005 - 12:29 AM
Doug your basing it on just massflow rate. With a larger pipe you change the volumetric flowrate. With a larger pipe the O2 sees lower emmision and will richen the trim to bring up what it think is a lean enviroment. Again none of this matters in open loop.

Volvospeed On Google+
.:: V70R : 30Forty50 : XC Forums ::.
#28
Posted 04 May 2005 - 02:17 AM
-Andy
1994 850T
1994 850 NA 5spd
#29
Posted 04 May 2005 - 02:59 AM
So why would you hav eto have the chip remaped if you have a stock turbo and a 3' down pipe and a chip upgrade?
#30
Posted 04 May 2005 - 03:19 AM
Re-read my post about volumemetric flowrates

Volvospeed On Google+
.:: V70R : 30Forty50 : XC Forums ::.
#31
Posted 04 May 2005 - 05:22 AM

#32
Posted 04 May 2005 - 02:23 PM
So...should we even touch the cat/catback...cuz that would result in better flow too (just after the front 02 sensor)
SpeedTuning 17PSI - MSD 6A - 3" Back - Sunglasses
#33 Guest_DougK_*
Posted 04 May 2005 - 04:32 PM
I never thought about it that way Chuck. Good point. Im used to tunning cars in open loop, the larger exhaust an improvement in VE did lean the mix out some. But metering less air in closed loop makes sense. Maybe the best fix would be the move the first o2 to the top of the DP where it is still semi "narrow".
#34
Posted 04 May 2005 - 05:05 PM
I know o2s want to be 300+ degree to operate but I dont think they way 1300 degrees.... Dunno, maybe they do

Volvospeed On Google+
.:: V70R : 30Forty50 : XC Forums ::.
#35
Posted 04 May 2005 - 05:12 PM
Dealer for Samco, Forge, KW Suspension, Aquamist, Quaife Differentials, Autometer, MSD, and more!
PM me or email me at jessaye@gmail.com if interested!
#36 Guest_DougK_*
#37
Posted 04 May 2005 - 05:20 PM
you talking about all 02's or just 850 02's?? as the old 240 turbos have the 02 right in the exhaust manifold right before the turbo.
even the stock rwd turbo cars and most all now have them them about 2-3 inches behind the outlet of the turbo so they do get and stay pretty hot

#38
Posted 04 May 2005 - 05:24 PM
for 850turbo w/stock 15g @17psi,...would 2.5" racecat and muffler be better off or worse than 3" full exhaust system??
dont you need backpressure and whatnot,..like will the 3" cause the turbo to take more time to spool up vs 2.5"
just checking again before i hook the shizzle up on my car one way or the other.
any thoughts, opinions, and reviews would be greatly appreciated...
g
My advice:
If cabin noise is a concern, to me there is only one option, the TME setup. It's the only one I've found that is still pretty quiet. It is defintely tuned.
And at 17 psi, I can't imagine going from 2.5" to 3" with straight thru mufflers is going to make much difference at all.
That's my worthless advice.
#39 Guest_DougK_*
Posted 04 May 2005 - 05:26 PM
#40
Posted 04 May 2005 - 05:28 PM
you'd be surprised, a little more exhaust flow can pick up all kinds of power on top end
and yes doug i'm right ... in the manifold ..just because your 240 was so far from stock you don't even remember
darn i guess i should read up on how these 850's work maybe i can figure out something on them ...
Edited by thelostartof, 04 May 2005 - 05:29 PM.

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



This topic is locked












