Thanks, back at cha!

***read***sig Pictures ***read***
#141
Posted 10 January 2007 - 11:37 PM
'98 V70T5M
'74 142
#142
Posted 11 January 2007 - 01:50 AM
i just wanted a straight answer as to why i had mine changed when my pictures were both shorter and not as wide as many of the other signatures that are still being allowed.
#143
Posted 11 January 2007 - 03:11 AM
i just wanted a straight answer as to why i had mine changed when my pictures were both shorter and not as wide as many of the other signatures that are still being allowed.
You're wrong, your pic WAS larger. I removed it and I checked it before hand, like I did with all the others.
'98 V70T5M
'74 142
#144
Posted 11 January 2007 - 03:13 AM
#147
Posted 11 January 2007 - 03:41 AM
i understand the personal pic but...
mike
Follow me to V70R and S60R.com
i was so drunk last night, i thought the toothpaste was astronaut food.
#148
Posted 11 January 2007 - 03:48 AM
oops? was caps lock on?
#150
Posted 11 January 2007 - 09:19 AM

40+ mods and counting...
#152
Posted 11 January 2007 - 09:49 AM
#153
Posted 11 January 2007 - 10:02 AM
maybe not a democracy, but I can still state my opinion on something. my original sig was smaller then yours is with all your text, so I don't get what the problem is. Even though I get that it would be hard to set a text maximum with pic max, I just think sigs that are simply too big be moderated, which I didn't feel my old one was. But then you all you have is someones opinion instead of definitive size.

40+ mods and counting...
#154
Posted 11 January 2007 - 10:10 AM
True, I see your point. But, as we're not in the law making position, ...
#155
Posted 11 January 2007 - 01:24 PM
Hmm. I find that hard to believe.. But if it is TRUE, then I appologize.
'98 V70T5M
'74 142
#156
Posted 11 January 2007 - 03:40 PM
#157
Posted 11 January 2007 - 03:58 PM
Ah......<hug>
Makes me sad that you are sad.
#158
Posted 11 January 2007 - 05:49 PM
http://web.archive.org - go fishing for it!
#159
Posted 11 January 2007 - 09:24 PM
I actually like the smaller sig, it makes you car look better.
#160
Posted 11 January 2007 - 09:53 PM
This issue has been brought up before, and the consensus has always been those with bandwidth issues / small screens need to turn off signature images in the control panel, or turn on image resizing / turn off browser images. I personally run two screens, one at 2048x1436 and another at 1600x1200, and I personally don't give a shit if someone stuck running at 800x600 has an issue because my sig is 700pix wide. I totally agree with a noobhammer for those who take a shitty 800x600 bitmap and set that as their signature, but a finite pixel count is really extreme. Who gives a shit if it's eleven pixels too high? That's half a percent of my screen, I'll deal. Besides, many people's sigs are much longer due to their mod format, with a new line after each mod.
This is funny because #1 you're the one dodging work, and #2 unless your sysadmin has a brain the size of a pea, he knows exactly what you're doing. However, he's probably more worried about the guy downloading malware and looking at porn on company time, if he's not actually fixing problems. I work for a company, less than 20 people, and we log EVERYTHING. What you print, where you go, when you log on, when you change your password, what files you access. It's very interesting to look through. If you don't want your coworkers to see you fucking around, then at least have the sense to go into your control panel and turn off sigs, or images in your browser.
Seriously. Even on my tablet (1024x768) the sigs aren't that bad, and when I'm on a low bandwidth connection like my cellphone or something, I'll just turn off images. C'mon people, this really isn't that hard.
True VS isn't a democracy. But the mods are supposed to be here for a better user experience, not to go around fulfilling napoleon complexes, or to make up for not making team captain in high school. If it's not about making the average user's experience markedly better (like getting rid of offensive posts, flames, spam, idiots), the mods should just leave it the hell alone. This isn't THEIR website, only one man can claim that, and I haven't seen him play any part in this (... maybe I missed something?).
I'm done with this issue, is 600x150 is the final size, then if I ever get around to making another sig, I'll consider that. However, the fact that time and energy was devoted to something so petty does say a lot.
1991 Jaguar XJ40 Sovereign - offical "project" car, almost working too.
1977 Chevy Corvette- RIP Uncle Keith
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



This topic is locked














