Midnight Caller

Members
  • Content Count

    928
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Midnight Caller last won the day on March 10

Midnight Caller had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

91 Good

About Midnight Caller

  • Rank
    Level 2 Member
  • Birthday 03/28/1981

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.piese-volvo.ro
  • Yahoo
    midnight_caller_ro

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Location
    Bucharest, Romania

Recent Profile Visitors

4,396 profile views
  1. Hello ! I think a GT28/GT30/GT31 frame would suffice for 400HP...
  2. Hello ! Is that the only table that gives you problems ? Can you succesfully edit other tables and save them ? Maybe there is a problem with the decimal separator (use "," instead of "." or the other way around)?
  3. I'm not having any differences between the gauge and the logged values anymore, I fixed that yesterday. I am using the right formula which also Piet/venderbroek suggested when they sent me the modded BIN The issue now îs that the logged AFR isn't oscillating around the requested AFR in the VE map (15) but rather around 14.7 (maybe a coincidence ?) I'm.using the AEM UEGO 30-4100 or 30-4110 with Bosch LSU4.9 which outputs 0-5V for AFR 10-20.
  4. Heeeey ! Piet, I've been trying to reach you for a long tine ! Everything ok ? As I was writing earlier, it seems like the WB mod ignores what is set in the VE map. Could you lend a hand please ? I had some issues with the modded BIN from the first release you sent me (car didn't start), and then the second file worked. Maybe You missed something in there ? Can I send you the BIN to take a look ?
  5. Hello ! Thank you for the detailed answer ! Basically shouldn't the wideband mod's purpose be to "move" the oscillation of reach/lean around the point set in the VE map ? If we set an AFR of 15 at the correesponding RPM/LOAD columns, shouldn't STFT flip point be around there ? As you are in the short clip I posted, It seems the changing STFT point îs around 14.7 not 15 (requested AFR, IT seldomly reaches that value). Thats's why I question If the mod is really working as expected.
  6. Well, after 5 years (of which 3 the car was unused because a tree fell over the top), the wideband ordeal IS OVER !!! I want to personally thank each and everyone of you that tried to help me out of this ! You guys are awesome !!! Ttoday, after fixing all vacuum related issues, and still didn't manage to obtain the right AFR, I decided to pull the ECU out and take it apart as I've forgot what I've done 5 years ago. The wiring was like this : - The AEM UEGO has 4 wires - black (-) / red (+) / white (0-5V output) / blue (serial output) - The + wire of the control
  7. Well, 20 minutes to take it down and 20 to put it back is not such an ordeal It seems that the PCV hose was only out of the house coupling. Put it back together and was good to go. Unfortunately that wasn't the reason if my AFR issues. I plugged the BOV, and pressure tested the intake system, no vac leaks. Tried calibrating the injectors again, I used the injector constant and the dead times in the M44 wikia (0.7188 and dead times from the wiki). Vac. is around -10, STFT is oscillating between -6% and 6%, MAF meters 13.8kg/h, load around 1.01. Requested AFR from VE map is 15.1
  8. Ok, back to square one. Removed the dump valve, same thing, so I started the hunt for vacuum leaks. And Lo, behold, the hose from the PCV canister to the intake duct îs split in two. Manifold down time
  9. Wait, what ?! You may be right, and the BOV be actually leaking air OUT, not IN the system, as it's before the throttle plate. You deserve a minimum sixpack of beers for that bitchslap you just gave me
  10. Exactly. That's why I think maybe leaning the whole VE Map by the offset I have would "fix" this situation I also did some aproximations regarding the dump valve. (Unfortunately I didn't have the time to take it out today, I helped a "brother" who bought an 1994 850 2.0T5 with 100.000 miles in mint condition, but one of the heater core hoses exploded on the way home. Yeeeey for April fool's ) If the dump valve would leak under vacuum, that would mean that the MAF would record less air than in reality (but mine measures 14-15kg/h at idle). Furthermore, the extra unmetered air should lea
  11. Hello ! Thank you so much for confirming. I was really intrigued by the -100/+99.2 STFT values. You are perfectly right about the dump valve, but the issues I'm fighting now are when idling. Yes, when dumping the extra air after being in boost, extra air measured by the MAF will lead to a pig rich condition for a short time. The issue I'm facing now is when idling or not under boost condition, the VE map cell / requested AFR is (let's say) 14.9-15 (low load, cruising, tuned for improved mileage), but the AFR gauge swings between 14.2 and 14.7. It's this offset I don't understand
  12. Hello ! No, the issue seems to be în the whole rpm band/load. I mentioned them at that time what controller I had and the difference îs quite small and constant. I guess If they would've calibrated for Innovate or Spartan the AFR would've gone more bezerk than that... If only I could reach one of them. Another solution would be of one of you that has It properly working and uses an AEM wired to the rear O2 could send me the BIN ? Or maybe they will eventually show up here
  13. Hello ! If you have a bin with that mod, could you please load up an XDF and let me know if you have the same weird stuff I've mentioned before ? (LTFT set to 0, STFT to 100, Load threshold for lambda control to 12.24 and TPS angle for WOT detection=106 ?) Regarding the dump valve, it's true that when calibrating the injectors, plugging the "command hose" (the vacuum hose) made the AFR leaner if I recall correctly (I'll check again tomorrow). I still can't wrap my head around why with the same setup, with the injector calibrator I can achieve an almost perfectly stable 14.7, but when