
From the front it reminds me a lot of the new Mazdas for some reason

From the back I like that Volvo went dual exhaust. Makes the car look a lot more balanced. They were a little late with this but better late than never.

Interior looks like pretty much all other Volvos now

4 cyl

6cyl...... ok good start but its heavier than the 5, less efficient, and makes the same power. Reminds me of their V8. Unless you really need that torque I am not seeing it. The only mention to a 5cyl was for the diesel models which most of us will not get.
There are more images and info at Volvocars.com for those who are interested but I was wondering everyones thoughts as more picture come out.
2011 First Thoughts
#1
Posted 09 February 2010 - 04:41 PM

Volvospeed On Google+
.:: V70R : 30Forty50 : XC Forums ::.
#2
Posted 09 February 2010 - 04:49 PM
At least they are still putting turbos on most of the cars still. They cant take that away from us!
White 95 850 Turbo, 200K Miles RIP
White 96 855R, 155K
#3
Posted 09 February 2010 - 04:53 PM
definetely want to see the interior in person, dash pad looks a little to plastic, but that could be the picture. from the looks of it they wont have one at the Chicago Auto Show.

Tom - 1998 V70T5M - 112K
#4
Posted 09 February 2010 - 05:03 PM
The interior is nice, but exterior leaves a lot to be desired.
#5
Posted 09 February 2010 - 05:31 PM
edit: are there larger versions of the engine pics? I didn't see them with a cursory glance at volvo's website.
#6
Posted 09 February 2010 - 05:32 PM

-1996 850 Turbo
-2007 XC90 V8
#7
Posted 09 February 2010 - 05:43 PM
#8
Posted 10 February 2010 - 12:14 AM
At least the interior looks nice...kinda. But I think I'll stick with my pre-98 Volvos for now.

1994 850 Turbo | Rica Stage III | Poke and Stretch
#9
Posted 10 February 2010 - 02:34 AM
Fmic, N/a throttle body, Ipd ecu, bilstein HD's, strut brace, qbm endlinks, sconeman pipe
Infinity speakers/sub
#10
Posted 10 February 2010 - 05:05 AM
1984 242 GLT- The money pit 15K+ invested
1980 242 GT-LH 2.2'd
#12
Posted 10 February 2010 - 01:13 PM
http://www.volvocars...es/default.aspx
That would have been a sexy car - more like the Jaguar XF than the Mazda 6.
#13
Posted 11 February 2010 - 01:01 AM
I like it's shape and the fact that they increased leg room for people in the back seat.
#14
Posted 11 February 2010 - 01:02 AM

Volvospeed On Google+
.:: V70R : 30Forty50 : XC Forums ::.
#15
Posted 11 February 2010 - 01:15 AM
Anything but that goddamn short 6 is fine with me. What an over-engineered sluggish POS.
Overall I like the new 60, I hope there is some back seat room in this model. I'm curious what the new engine/transmission/drivetrain configurations will be.
#17
Posted 12 February 2010 - 03:08 AM
According to this unofficial website http://www.fastestla...olvo_S60_R.html
The old R with less power and weighing 3667 lbs did it's 0-100km/h in 6.3s
Where as this one with awd according to the article at Swedespeed http://forums.swedes...hread?id=134363
does 0-100km/h in 6.5s
so yeah it might be a little bit more heavier ~3700-3800 lbs
#18
Posted 21 February 2010 - 08:59 AM
01' 72T5M
Oooo, thats nice.
HRE 19's Sonic Blue
06' M3 Competition Pkg
#19
Posted 21 February 2010 - 09:02 PM
#20
Posted 24 February 2010 - 07:52 PM
Kashif, on 12 February 2010 - 03:08 AM, said:
According to this unofficial website http://www.fastestla...olvo_S60_R.html
The old R with less power and weighing 3667 lbs did it's 0-100km/h in 6.3s
Where as this one with awd according to the article at Swedespeed http://forums.swedes...hread?id=134363
does 0-100km/h in 6.5s
so yeah it might be a little bit more heavier ~3700-3800 lbs
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





















