I'm borrowing some pictures from the forum at Turbo Performance Club to show you guys a new product.




These plates are available in either 3.4 or 5 degrees.
Posted 26 March 2010 - 06:37 PM




Posted 26 March 2010 - 06:51 PM
Posted 26 March 2010 - 07:27 PM
I guess, no. IIRC S60/V70 have independent rear suspension.Hmmm interesting
I'm under the impression that these are designed to add negative rear camber degrees to a car.
so the following question may be stupid...
Could these plates be used to correct negative rear camber situations for lowered non-awd S60/V70's?
IPD offers a rear lower contral eccentric bushing only for the AWD S60/v70.
'97 850 2.0 2.3 T5m Konis, springs, NA cams, 18t, RICA, MBC @ 18psi, 3" from turbo to cat-back, cut-out in progress, 9 series lip & projector retro, SSW Trex
'95 960 2.3 T5 in progress
http://narancsphotoblog.blogspot.com
Posted 26 March 2010 - 07:44 PM
-Kevin-
2004 V70R: 3 angle valve job, Phuzzy FMIC, IPD Neutral rear sway
White '96 850 T5M:Black '94 850 T5
Posted 26 March 2010 - 07:45 PM
It's not my car but and I don't have much info. It's non adjustable and custom built for the car by the Swedish company Sellholm Tuning.To the OP: do you have any more info on that rear coilover setup? Did you strengthen the top strut mount, if so, how?
Could you post more pics of it?
Posted 26 March 2010 - 07:50 PM



-Kevin-
2004 V70R: 3 angle valve job, Phuzzy FMIC, IPD Neutral rear sway
White '96 850 T5M:Black '94 850 T5
Posted 26 March 2010 - 07:51 PM
Some more pictures of the car here here.It's not my car but and I don't have much info. It's non adjustable and custom built for the car by the Swedish company Sellholm Tuning.
There's some more pictures of the coilovers here. You have to register on the forum to access it.
Posted 26 March 2010 - 08:04 PM
It's not my car but and I don't have much info. It's non adjustable and custom built for the car by the Swedish company Sellholm Tuning.
There's some more pictures of the coilovers here. You have to register on the forum to access it.
OMG, that car looks like funSome more pictures of the car here here.
'97 850 2.0 2.3 T5m Konis, springs, NA cams, 18t, RICA, MBC @ 18psi, 3" from turbo to cat-back, cut-out in progress, 9 series lip & projector retro, SSW Trex
'95 960 2.3 T5 in progress
http://narancsphotoblog.blogspot.com
Posted 26 March 2010 - 08:10 PM
Posted 26 March 2010 - 09:50 PM
Posted 26 March 2010 - 10:48 PM
I agree, no thanks.It sure looks like that plate would put a lot of added stress on the heads of the bolts that hold the hub on because the bolt is at 90* to matin surface of the hub...
Looks dangerous.
Posted 27 March 2010 - 03:51 PM
It sure looks like that plate would put a lot of added stress on the heads of the bolts that hold the hub on because the bolt is at 90* to matin surface of the hub...
Looks dangerous.
Posted 27 March 2010 - 04:00 PM
Because both mating surfaces are supposed to be flat, the bolts are supposed to seat flush against the arm. This design does not compensate for this. Soooo the head of the bolt will not be flat it will be torque at the same degree that the plate is cut.Huh?
Posted 27 March 2010 - 05:19 PM
Posted 27 March 2010 - 05:44 PM

Posted 27 March 2010 - 05:53 PM
Posted 27 March 2010 - 06:02 PM

Posted 27 March 2010 - 06:16 PM
Posted 27 March 2010 - 07:41 PM
There you go, MS Paint diagram
![]()

Posted 27 March 2010 - 11:26 PM
agreed the amount of fail is amazing
whatever you say dude!