Fudge_Brownie, on 14 July 2010 - 12:31 PM, said:
I don't own or operate this site and have no part in any of the code or process of selecting software. While it may seem that I "tapp danced around", that was hardly my intention. I'm only expressing my personal beliefs/opinion. Chuck will simply tell you "IE sucks, get something better" and you're right; that's no secret. If I remember to, I'll talk to him tonight about the IE banner. I'm serious when I say he
might like the idea

Though having the website suck might demonstrate the browser's incapabilities and drive people to learn more about the situation. I'm not trying to pull a curtain over anyone's eyes, I have no reason to.
And while we're on the topic of breaking things down, I should add for those who aren't aware that this forum isn't handcoded by chuck. Most forums aren't, it starts out with a base forum software package. As I said earlier, the small hobby sites you're talking about are 2000% less complex than a forum and are significantly easier to write in general, as well as ensure cross browser compability.
sorry i was under the impressing that you worked/coded the site. In that case you were not Tap dancing. lol
however the 2nd part of your post is still only half true. YES a forum is much harder to code than a hobby site. however, when you compare VS to EVERY other FORUM on the NET. its one of the few who aren't compatible with IE.
just some numbers using forums i frequent........
volvospeed.com gets about....6400 visitors per day.
orlandoforums.com gets about...3300 visitors per day.
turbobricks.com gets about......2200 visitors per day.
stanceworks.com gets about ......6300 visitors per day
CFLeuro.net (our local car clubs forum) only gets 120 visitors per day.
all are compatible with IE except VS. and they are all much smaller than VS (except for stanceworks). I realize making VS compatible with IE is a lot of work but when you are large scale site, you need to cater to your members. again thats just how i would run a Forum.