#1
Posted 07 September 2011 - 09:44 PM
The point of this thread is to bring to light information that will help you get the most from your tune, regardless where you get it. For this discussion we’ll be focusing on US market M4.3 models. I’ll have another thread up for M4.4 as it is a vastly different fuel system in respect to its considerable increase in map density and complexity.
Let’s start with the basics:
Fuel and timing tables/curves are predominately predicated on the supporting components of the vehicle. I.E. if the car has larger than stock injectors or a larger MAF the fuel tables must be tuned for this specifically, there is no real room for freehand tuning. It's essentially a function of math to hit the intended Air/Fuel target at any given load/RPM point. Ignition tables do have some room for differences tuner to tuner and this comes primarily from the 3 main maps that make up the base timing table. Things like WOT ignition timing, advance timing multiplier, part load timing, and the interaction of these 3 maps provides some room for tuners to vary how they control ignition timing. Remember when your algebra teacher said you’d need this later in life, well at least for me she was right.
So far as boost goes it’s all over the place and has more to do with each tuners particular take on how a boost map should be curved. In the following video you can see more about what I’m referring to. Boost map curves are wildly different and can be freehand tuned quite a bit more than fuel and timing maps. Point of clarity, of all three timing is king when it comes to power.
As far as this thread and the information in it goes, I want to be clear on this point, my intention is not to bad mouthing other tuners. My point is to simply bring forth information for the community to weigh, then make up your own minds on what best suites your driving style, environment, and particular vehicle setup.
Let’s dive in a little deeper:
Neither M4.3 or M4.4 have a boost pressure sensor, neither do they have a MAP sensor. M4.4 is equipped with a BARO sensor but its sole purpose is to measure the altitude the vehicle is at and help dial in the fuel adjustment alt variable. M4.3 does not have a BARO.
The ECU calculates engine load using the following sensor inputs MAF, TPS, RPM. Now, don’t muck up the waters and use the term volume when referring to MAF, the MAF measures air MASS not volume. This is important to understand for discussions around boost curves. Once this Load (Sometimes called LOD) variable is calculated the ECU can compare this value to the current BCS duty cycle on the boost map and extrapolate a boost value. Believe it or not both M4.3 and M4.4 have overboost maps but these maps are pretty small and don’t provide much resolution so the overboost map only acts when overboost is pretty significant. This overboost map is not to be confused with the internal load limiter also known as ‘fuel cut’ or the MAF flow limitation map.
Recall that the two axis of the boost map are RPM and throttle angle. An interesting note in M4.3 the ECU stops measuring throttle angle past 58 degrees. Why? Throttle angles past ~55 degrees have little impact on the actual amount of airflow entering the engine which is also why upper throttle angle boost curving is so challenging. As a tuner it’s where I spend most my time in the boost map making ARD Tunes more linear. In this way it makes for a much more driveable car. The Boost is less on/off and more gradual with respect to throttle movement.
Day by day:
As a driver what do I need to know about M4.3?
For starters M4.3 relies HEAVILY on base value. Values such as wastegate pretension, accurate sensor readings (i.e. MAF, TPS, O2) and good state of maintenance are CRITICAL for proper engine operation and boost development.
So does that mean that a TPS out of adjustment could affect my boost? Yes, it certainly can. However the primary two issues I find with folks who experience odd running or boost development after receiving a tune who had a stock ECU before come from ignition misfire and vacuum leaks. Components that operated fine under stock levels of performance will suddenly show their age as increased levels of performance/boost ask more from the components and they start to fail. Good stage 0 is my #1 recommendation when it comes to performance from these cars.
Why can’t I just crank up my wastegate and go by feel? You can however it will take a bit longer to really dial it in and doing it right is so much better. The ECU calculates the boost based on what the Load value is and overlays that by the BCS duty cycle. The ECU is programmed to expect the wastegate to open at a certain pressure and if this is off by even a few psi then you can end up with a car that will never fully boost or has boost overshoot you can’t control. I’ll have some further info later this week once I get measurements back and we can go over some basic math to understand why wastegate adjustment is so important and why tight sprung wastegates can be useful if selected correctly.
That’s enough for us all to chew on for now. Feedback and questions are always welcome!
Volvo Tuning - ARDtuning.com - Find us on Facebook "Active Research & Development"
#2
Posted 07 September 2011 - 10:19 PM
#3
Posted 07 September 2011 - 10:39 PM
K.I.S.S. - Keep It Simple Stupid
'97 854 GLT | 16T | ARD Green | OBX full exhaust | R Mani | NA TB | Unorthodox Racing Underdrive Pulley | etc...
me: you got penis envy .... wife: i got penis scissors
#4
Posted 07 September 2011 - 10:45 PM
#5
Posted 07 September 2011 - 10:47 PM
Edited by ARD - Lucky, 07 September 2011 - 10:48 PM.
Volvo Tuning - ARDtuning.com - Find us on Facebook "Active Research & Development"
#6
Posted 07 September 2011 - 11:28 PM
Right - now where's the ME4.4 w/COP?
Just kidding, I know you are keeping it in mind.
Curious though, what about setups like mine that use a Apexi AVC-R or similar boost controller? How do you work with that, since the ECU boost map isn't a consideration?

1998 V70 XR M66 Quaife 14J PTE6262 BB Built '04 2.3l Block Wiseco Pistons 147mm H-Beams '03 Ported Head EnemY21Cams TurboTuner 710cc Inj, DW300, 3" DP back Dual Magnaflow 14834's Apr 2013 408WHP AWD (@7925rpm) 347WTq(@4400rpm)@18psi LGSpeed Header Custom Intake Manifold 30x12.5x3.5"Treadstone FMIC AP Racing Clutch KU SM Billet Flywheel Kaplhenke CoilOvers
#7
Posted 07 September 2011 - 11:46 PM
Ballerness x 10. Makes me wanna take my pants off & swim in my parking lot naked shouting ARD ARD but people would think I'm drowning rather than the reality of me being "special"
Dr.PorkenheimersBonerJuice: no you didnt kev, you jacked it to pictures of teen mom. that isnt cougar
SHIT IM SELLIN ; SHIT YOU BUYIN. DONT BE A BITCH ; CLICK IT
#8
Posted 08 September 2011 - 12:02 AM
awesome lucky, awesome. next summer i will upgrade from a green to a blue tune!
any hp comparisons?
- Greg - '96 Red/Tan 855 R - M - 104k miles - '98 Blue/Charcoal V70 T5 - M - 170k miles -
#9
Posted 08 September 2011 - 04:45 AM

Almighty 850 T5 16T 019-Black Stone
0-60: 5.7
1/4mile: 14.3
Vmax:North of 160mph
"That's why we drive old cars and try to act proud of it." -RSPi
#10
Posted 08 September 2011 - 04:49 AM
Dr.PorkenheimersBonerJuice: no you didnt kev, you jacked it to pictures of teen mom. that isnt cougar
SHIT IM SELLIN ; SHIT YOU BUYIN. DONT BE A BITCH ; CLICK IT
#11
Posted 08 September 2011 - 05:11 AM
what do you recommend and why?
#12
Posted 08 September 2011 - 05:27 AM
Dr.PorkenheimersBonerJuice: no you didnt kev, you jacked it to pictures of teen mom. that isnt cougar
SHIT IM SELLIN ; SHIT YOU BUYIN. DONT BE A BITCH ; CLICK IT
#13
Posted 08 September 2011 - 09:28 AM
until then, many ppl questioned the tcv vs. the bcs on the 850's and Lucky was testing them..
it was also around the time i'd gotten a stage III tune, so i went with the new hd tcv.
i haven't run anything other than the tcv since, including on my ARD tune..
sometimes (seldomly) i do get that "bounce back" boost where it goes hard and linear, then as the car shifts and boost changes, it softens up a tad then goes hard again (this isnt the car saving the rods either, it's all above 3k rpm @ this point).. this IS NOT drop off though.
"drop off" was the stage III tune i had, and this is when the car would spike up boost then drop off while in the same gear... see how that's different?
i know what im feeling is NOT a flaw in tuning (cause im hitting my target boost), but rather the boost control..
again, tcv vs. bcs?
Christian had mentioned how well a new stock bcs handled his ARD tune with 19t..
so it's got me questioning if i should get a new bcs for my ARD tune with 18t??
i wanted to hear it from the man.. i woulda PMed him but i wanted you guys to see as well which was best and why..
so Lucky, stop drinking coffee now lol
#14
Posted 08 September 2011 - 01:58 PM
Lucky
#15
Posted 08 September 2011 - 06:26 PM
First thing to identify is how the BCS and TCV are different. Put simply the BCS is a bleed system while the TCV is a block system. What does that mean?
The BCS by default routes pressure from the turbocharger outlet (red BCS port) to the wastegate (yellow BCS port). So if the BCS were never activated then the only boost pressure the car would build would be whatever the base wastegate setting was. So if the base wastegate setting was 5psi for instance, and the BCS were not activated or functional, then the vehicle would only make 5psi. Once the turbo has developed 5 psi the pressure would travel through the BCS to the wastegate and overcome the internal spring tension and open the wastegate door in the turbo, bypassing the exhaust pressure in the exhaust manifold and maintaining the 5psi. If you're still not sure on what all these terms mean watch the video "Turbo 101" on Youtube.
Now when the BCS is activated the red and yellow ports are still routed together, in fact they are always routed one to the other. The only thing that changes when the BCS is activated is the vent port opens (blue port) and allows the boost pressure coming in on the red port to be bled off into the intake tube after the MAF. The reason the turbo can't out flow the vent line (blue port) and keep the wastegate open is that internally in the BCS the red port has an opening that is only ~1mm in diameter relative the the 3.7mm diameter ports of the red and yellow lines.
The TCV in M4.4 is essentially the same however instead of bleeding off the boost pressure from the turbo (red TCV port) it simply blocks it. So the TCV is a simple 3 way valve. When it is inactive the TCV routes turbo pressure to the wastegate (red to yellow). When the TCV is active the turbo pressure is blocked and the wastegate is routed to the vent port (yellow to blue). Only slightly different but it is important to understand the difference for the conversation around using a TCV in a vehicle with a BCS.
Let's go further.
Why is it that only 5psi wastegate pretension can hold back 15psi or more of boost? MATH TIME!
The wastegate arm that connects to the wastegate actuator is 24mm long.
The internal wastegate arm that connects to the flapper is 12.5mm long.
So that gives us a leverage ratio of 1.92
The diameter of the flapper in the turbo is approx 0.880 inch, given the Pi R2 for area we get 0.607 square inches
This means that at 15psi there is 9.1psi against the flapper. Again the reason for this is that the flappers active surface area is less than 1 square inch.
With a leverage ratio of 1.92 that means the wastegate would only have to be pretensioned to 4.7psi to hold 15psi of backpressure in the exhaust manifold.
For any other math geeks out there please check my figures and make sure I haven't made a mistake.
Thanks!
Edited by ARD - Lucky, 08 September 2011 - 06:28 PM.
Volvo Tuning - ARDtuning.com - Find us on Facebook "Active Research & Development"
#16
Posted 08 September 2011 - 06:58 PM
This means that at 15psi there is 9.1 pound force against the flapper. Again the reason for this is that the flappers active surface area is less than 1 square inch.
With a leverage ratio of 1.92 that means the wastegate would only have to be pretensioned to 4.7 pound force to hold 15psi of backpressure in the exhaust manifold.
Area * pressure = force
The question is then a matter of the wastegate diaphragm area and spring rate to figure out the appropriate crack pressure. I've always assumed that the Volvo wastegate number (ie: 300/70), is a measure of the actuator diaphragm area and spring rate, but I am not certain, and the units are unclear. Perhaps it's 300mm² and 70N/m?
#17
Posted 08 September 2011 - 07:45 PM
#18
Posted 08 September 2011 - 08:48 PM
#19
Posted 08 September 2011 - 08:50 PM
Dealer for ARP, Samco, Forge, KW Suspension, Aquamist, Quaife Differentials, ATP Turbo, Autometer, MSD, and more!
PM me or email me at jessaye@gmail.com if interested!
#20
Posted 08 September 2011 - 09:00 PM
Thanks for the correction Ozzi!
Appreciate all the input as this thread is for all of us, including myself. As much credit as you guys give me I don't know it all but together we all know more!
Edited by ARD - Lucky, 08 September 2011 - 09:10 PM.
Volvo Tuning - ARDtuning.com - Find us on Facebook "Active Research & Development"
















