fastwagonhawaii, on 20 December 2011 - 09:36 PM, said:
Very nice find . I do like the black a lot.
Thanks for the comments
dublin14, on 20 December 2011 - 11:10 PM, said:
NIce car no trq lol. They really are a good car though.
Thanks, and you're right the torque is nothing compared to the Volvo. I mean 164 compared to 220 (stock), and now over 400TQ, is just no comparison. Even though, this Acura is still an enjoyable drive.
T5power, on 21 December 2011 - 02:10 AM, said:
decent choice. well rounded car. to me it's a bit boring but it's definitely a sensible car. and im sure the 6mt makes it more fun to drive than the auto. congrats!
The 6MT makes the car enjoyable to drive, I can't even begin to imagine how bland this car would be as an automatic... The car was purchased with a specific goal in mind, and it doesn't blow away any specific category, but it meets and accommodates each category with the right amount of compromise.
fivex84, on 21 December 2011 - 02:26 AM, said:
Your not looking at the positive... no torque steer.
They really are nice cars though.
Thanks.
n00bkiller944, on 21 December 2011 - 05:01 AM, said:
I like these cars. I have a buddy who has one but it is an automatic. I am sure the 6MT makes it 10000x better!
Thanks, yeah the manual is nice to drive and its actually not that bad in heavy traffic, given how soft/ lite, the clutch and shifter are to engage, its not daunting at all...
Burgess24, on 21 December 2011 - 02:16 PM, said:
Its a 5 seater S2000. I have been looking at them to replace the wife's Odyssey.
How much did the front end paint cost out there? I had a 1500 dollar quote here in Ontario.
For me this was a perfect balance, the car is presentable to show up to business meetings with, or have an older colleague ride along to a meeting. Handles amazingly, which makes up for the lack of speed, but the 6speed milks every bit of performance the 2.4L I-4 produces... and still manages to get great mileage, well great compared to what I'm used to...
Not babying it all I am currently (8.4L/ 100km or ~28mpg), and I am slightly less than 1/2 tank mark with ~400kms (~249miles). With my driving style this is a huge improvement over the volvo or the winter beater (91 Nissan Stanza), with either of them i'd be lucky to get 450kms (~279miles) out of a tank...
As for the painting, luckily my insurance had covered a large portion of it, I only paid ($800 out of pocket) for the "R" Bumper (~$500, new at dealer) and matching paint (~$300)... the total bill for the front end was over $5000 cdn. It is absolutely retarded how expensive body work is up here, sure you can get it done cheap but you get what you pay for, and in the end it will cost you severely... My trunk lid, with spoiler, and the rear quarter panels is gonna cost me slightly north of $2000, but the body shop claims that since mine is a pearled paint, its a bit more complicated as its a three step paint system, versus typical two steps... Uggghhhh... so your $1500 as long as its a reputable shop is a steal of a deal as far as I'm concerned... good luck either way...

1996 Volvo 850 Platinum Edition
"R" Exhaust Manifold, Garrett Stage III 54 Trim T3/T4 Hybrid Turbo, 550cc @ 3bar Injectors, Racelab Intake Manifold, 3" Full SS Exhaust, TurboTuner, CAI, BOV, Custom FMIC Setup, Crane Ignition, 5spd Swap, Walbro Fuel Pump, KONI FSD & Eibach Springs, IPD Sway Bar Kit, IPD BBK,
328WHP & 376WTQ New Results comming soon...