Turbo Manifold Volvo 850 / V70
#1
Posted 22 January 2012 - 09:03 AM
http://img210.images...404/foto1sr.jpg
http://img6.imagesha...226/foto2uh.jpg
http://img813.images...897/foto3na.jpg
http://img194.images...160/foto4ui.jpg
http://img338.images...366/foto5mm.jpg
#2
Posted 22 January 2012 - 12:40 PM
1998 V70 T5 M
1994 854M Silver on Black
1998 Black on Black S70T5
1995 855 N/A @174K: Lightning strike, running on 4 cylinders, mixing fluids, holes in the gas tank, 3 different rims, exhaust leak. DD UNTIL 200K.... Killed By Faulty
1998 S70 GLT...RIP at 320K
1990 245 DL M47
#3
Posted 22 January 2012 - 02:01 PM
#4
Posted 22 January 2012 - 02:26 PM

#5
Posted 22 January 2012 - 03:14 PM
It looks nice, but seems to be overkill.
96 854R IPD ECU - Turbo XS dual stage MBC - Samco - Koni - 16T angled -OBX - R mani - IPD CAI?
13.7x @ 103 mph with automagic
94 855 Turbo.... In a state of cryostasis

#6
Posted 22 January 2012 - 03:55 PM
Rectified plan in the head flange.
I can realize what did you want..
Tomorrow I post a picture of my manifold installed in the car
#8
Posted 22 January 2012 - 05:40 PM
Teo5R, on 22 January 2012 - 03:55 PM, said:
Its cool that its equal length, but I it seems like if it was planned out better it could have been a bit smaller.
96 854R IPD ECU - Turbo XS dual stage MBC - Samco - Koni - 16T angled -OBX - R mani - IPD CAI?
13.7x @ 103 mph with automagic
94 855 Turbo.... In a state of cryostasis

#9
Posted 22 January 2012 - 05:48 PM
I'm forecasting high engine bay temps with a slight chance of cracking and/or something catching fire.
#10
Posted 22 January 2012 - 06:19 PM

Current : 1998 S70 T5
Previous: 1999 S80 T6
Family: 2002 S80 T6, 2005 XC90 2.5T AWD
#11
Posted 22 January 2012 - 06:45 PM
Teo5R, on 22 January 2012 - 03:55 PM, said:
Except the length of the pipes are SOOOO long, you're gonna lose a massive amount of energy to heat losses before it makes it to the turbo. Equal number of bends as well?
Not to rain on your parade, but something like this would have been better.. fewer bends, and it's still equal length within a 1/2" iirc.
#12
Posted 22 January 2012 - 08:45 PM
That's a multitude of bends

Curious to see it on the car. Looks like it will be a PITA to install with the motor in place.

1998 V70 XR M66 PTE6262 BB Built '04 2.3l Block '03 Ported Head EnemY21Cams TurboTuner 710cc Inj, 3" DP back Dual Magnaflow 14834's May 2011 355WHP(@6400rpm) 347WTq(@4400rpm)@22psi Now with LGSpeed Header & Custom Intake Manifold! BIG 31x12x3"FMIC
#13
Posted 22 January 2012 - 10:48 PM
I'm interested to compare a lot of opinion to realize the best manifold.
What is for you the best diameter of pipe, and the best length, for our engine with about 500-600 hp?
To reply a last thread:
There is no problem to install the manifold into the car without removing anything...
#14
Posted 22 January 2012 - 11:08 PM
#15
Posted 23 January 2012 - 12:15 AM
Optimal diameter is gonna depend on whether you're trying to push every last HP from the setup, or if you want to optimize more for better response/turbo spool. I tend towards the smaller diameter, especially if you can keep the overall length and number of bends down. You'll also want it to be matched up to the intake side, so that both have a similar effect on the VE curve. Don't wanna optimize one for 3500rpm, and the other for 5000rpm
For 500hp, the "R manifold" will work too
#16
Posted 23 January 2012 - 03:14 AM
Teo5R, on 22 January 2012 - 10:48 PM, said:
That's good - I had enough issues with the LG Speed header - aligning turbo, DP, etc. Mine is also AWD, though.

1998 V70 XR M66 PTE6262 BB Built '04 2.3l Block '03 Ported Head EnemY21Cams TurboTuner 710cc Inj, 3" DP back Dual Magnaflow 14834's May 2011 355WHP(@6400rpm) 347WTq(@4400rpm)@22psi Now with LGSpeed Header & Custom Intake Manifold! BIG 31x12x3"FMIC
#17
Posted 23 January 2012 - 07:33 AM
lookforjoe, on 23 January 2012 - 03:14 AM, said:
That's good - I had enough issues with the LG Speed header - aligning turbo, DP, etc. Mine is also AWD, though.

Also mine is Awd
What thickness did you advise ?
Thanks a lot for the answer
ozzimark, on 23 January 2012 - 12:15 AM, said:
Optimal diameter is gonna depend on whether you're trying to push every last HP from the setup, or if you want to optimize more for better response/turbo spool. I tend towards the smaller diameter, especially if you can keep the overall length and number of bends down. You'll also want it to be matched up to the intake side, so that both have a similar effect on the VE curve. Don't wanna optimize one for 3500rpm, and the other for 5000rpm
For 500hp, the "R manifold" will work too
In my opinion 1,5" (38mm) of pipe diameter is a little bit small. I have seen with 48 mm of diameter it's better for temperature.
What thickness did you use for the pipe?
#18
Posted 23 January 2012 - 10:48 AM
#19
Posted 23 January 2012 - 11:08 AM
Deimos, on 23 January 2012 - 10:48 AM, said:
i've seen from my pipe dealer 44,5 mm of external diameter and 2mm of thickness (internal diameter 40,5 mm )...
#20
Posted 23 January 2012 - 11:27 AM
Teo5R, on 23 January 2012 - 07:33 AM, said:
What thickness did you use for the pipe?
It's a matter of goals really. IMO, 1.5" is too big for 500-600hp. Keep in mind that 1.5" schedule 10 pipe is 1.90" OD, .109" wall, for 1.682" ID. 1.25" scd 10 pipe would probably be better suited for the power levels you're talking about, at 1.66" OD, .109" wall for 1.442" ID... but even then, may still be a little on the large side for good response and minimal heat losses in a tubular design.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

















