ozzimark, on 01 February 2012 - 10:51 PM, said:
No, it's a viscous coupling because it relies on fluid visocity to transfer the torque through the unit. Think of a bunch of plates spinning next to each other in a thick fluid.
Well, to be fair, the heat, generated by the shear/friction of the spinning plates, is what increases the viscosity/thickness.
So it is true that the heating of the fluid is what causes power to be transferred.
ozzimark, on 01 February 2012 - 10:51 PM, said:
However, I am pretty sure that on the VC AWD systems, there is a lockup that engages if the fluid gets too hot so you don't burn up the VC unit.
Is there? I thought that if the fluid rises to a certain temperature at a normal rate, it becomes almost solid and the shear/friction is eliminated because the plates beginning to spin at the same relative speed again. In other words, there should never be enough shear/friction to cause overheating unless you are dealing with an extremely powerful engine or locked-up wheels.
ozzimark, on 01 February 2012 - 10:51 PM, said:
The VC unit transfers torque from front to rear when the fronts are spinning faster than the rears, regardless of clutch state. If the rears are locked and the fronts are spinning, that'll cause the VC unit to do its thing.
Deimos, on 02 February 2012 - 03:21 AM, said:
The clutch disconnects the engine from the drivetrain, transmission and beyond. But that's not where the potential for damage in AWD appears, it's between the front and rear sections of the drivetrain. This is also why you have to flatbed tow almost all AWD cars.
Problem is, even with the engine connected, the drivetrain is all connected to itself still, and the vehicle's speed actively drives the drivetrain. So a major speed differential will cause, in the old AWD, the viscous to seize up, drive the rest of the wheels, and if it can't it will go pop pretty quick.
That makes sense. Would love to know more about how the freewheel works to understand if clutch-in engages "coasting mode" / freewheel. Thank you, andyb5, for posting what you did. I had only seen an older document on the same systems with less info.
ozzimark, on 01 February 2012 - 10:51 PM, said:
I'm not 100% on this, but I bet the lockup unit just senses input rotation direction for the reversing lock-up function.
Would love to find out if this is how it works or not. Currently, all I know is that a vacuum actuator is involved.

Looks like it should be right after the cut off in that image from andyb5.