You guys are clearly reading too far into what I say. Don't read between the lines. I'm not comparing the Evo to a Volvo at ALL. I'm comparing it to any other HIGH PERFORMANCE car out there. Like you said, Eric, that would be comparing apples to oranges and I'm NOT trying to do that at all. I think Volvo (edit: particularly FWD or AWD Volvo) and Performance together in a sentence is a joke unless you are using the word performance very, very loosely.
Let's use your example of a Camaro. A camaro has a lot more class than an Evo. Why? Because for the Camaro to run some good times the driver had to have put some effort into it and have actually accomplished something. There is nothing special about tuning an Evo. It's just way too easy to get good performance out of an Evo and afterwards all you are left with is an really fast really ugly lancer. If Mitsubishi had made something other than a Lancer perform like that (a gallant maybe?) I would be impressed, but I just feel like they took a piece of stuff and made it really, really fast. Sure, it's reliable as all hell. It's got an incredibly strong engine, as a matter of fact. And it's faster than anything else under $30k as far as I know. As a matter of fact it's faster than just about anything under $40k, too. It's even faster than MOST cars under $125k. But that doesn't make it not a piece of stuff. It still feels like a lancer when you touch it, and lancers feel like they are held together with safety pins most of the time.
Let's take another example. Dougs car. If Doug raced an Evo and lost I'd be much more interested in Doug's car than in any Evo VIII. Why? Because Doug has put a LOT of work into his car to make it as fast as it is and it is somewhat unique, where as the Evo driver probably did jack stuff and now has a really ugly really fast lancer.
In summary an Evo really is GOOD at doing what it does, and if you ask me all it does is go really really fast while still being a POS.
Edited by Legend854T5R, 30 March 2004 - 05:36 PM.