24 replies to this topic

[merlin390]

Hillary Clinton (D-NY) has already started her 2008 presidential campaign by aligning herself with the military and pretending to be tough on terror. Fortunately, the ultra-liberal Hillary has yet to brainwash all of the voting public in to believing that her symbolism is really substance. Many have never forgotten that when she was co-president for eight years she was quoted as saying: " I loathe the military."
(read the message below the photo)



The picture shows that this soldier has been thru Survival School and learned his lessons well. He's giving the sign of "coercion" with his left hand. These hand signs are taught in survival school to be used by POW's as a method of posing messages back to our intelligence services who may view the photo or video. This guy was obviously being coerced into shaking hands with Hillary Clinton. It's ironic how little she knew that he would so inform us about the photo---perhaps because she's never understood our military to begin with.

If you consider that there have been an average of 160,000 troops in the Iraq theater of operations during the last 22 months, and a total of 2112 deaths, that gives a firearm death rate of 60 per 100,000.




The rate in Washington D.C. is 80.6 per 100,000.

That means that you are about 25% more likely to be shot and killed in our Nation's Capitol, which has some of the strictest gun control laws in
the nation, than you are in Iraq........................Conclusion: We should immediately pull out of Washington

[JDELUNA]

I like LOL !!!! God Bless

[WhiteT5]

Hillary Joke:


HILLARY'S FIRST NIGHT AS PRESIDENT
in January 2009


Hillary Clinton gets elected President and is spending her
first night in the White House. She has waited so long....
The ghost of George Washington appears, and Hillary says,
"How can I best serve my country?"


Washington says, "Never tell a lie."
"Ouch!" Says Hillary, "I don't know about that."


The next night, the ghost of Thomas Jefferson appears...
Hillary says, "How can I best serve my country?"


Jefferson says,
"Listen to the people."
"Ohhh, I really don't want to do that!"


On the third night, the ghost of Abe Lincoln appears..
Hillary says, "How can I best serve my country?"


Lincoln says,

"Go to the theater."

[javadoc]

Funny stuff!

[mmetz]

Mike says: "I loathe hillary"

[Asinine]

Is having a president who understands the military the most important criteria for electing a new leader?

[gdizzle]

Mike says: "I loathe hillary"

+1

Is having a president who understands the military the most important criteria for electing a new leader?

No, but having one that isn't a dumb liberal bitch is important.

[EricF]

Is having a president who understands the military the most important criteria for electing a new leader?

Most important, no... Important? Yes. They're the highest ranking executive officer and have command over the armed forces.

[Mr. Norm]

Is having a president who understands the military the most important criteria for electing a new leader?

Only if they wish to remain alive!

[mmetz]

No, but having one that isn't a dumb liberal oh yeah! is important.

ding!

emphasis on dumb and liberal and oh yeah!

[Asinine]

No, but having one that isn't a dumb liberal oh yeah! is important.

Truth!

emphasis on dumb and liberal and oh yeah!

I'll agree emphasis on dumb and oh yeah!, but the 'conservative' Republican haven't been too conservative with anything except brokeback bashing and moving toward making pregnancy a political decision not a womans decision.

[resa850]

why does everyone hate Hillary so much (aside from the above explanation)? Being on the west coast, i am not as aware of her policies as those in the east. I mean, she's not my favorite, but i wouldn't say i hate her

Edited by resa850, 26 February 2006 - 10:30 AM.

[starfish]

why does everyone hate Hillary so much (aside from the above explanation)? Being on the west coast, i am not as aware of her policies as those in the east. I mean, she's not my favorite, but i wouldn't say i hate her

For starters
With odds of 250 million to 1, she changed $5,000 into $100,000 by investing in cattle futures.
She tried to give us a Canadian Health Care system.
She hid her Rose Law firm billings from the special prosecutor. Only after the investigation was over did then they magically appear on her table.
She got Bill to pardon all the FALN terrorists to help her get elected by the Puerto Ricans in New York, where she had never lived before.
She can't even tell the truth on her own name. She said she got her name from Sir Edmund Hillary, the first person to climb Mount Everest. She said "her father named her after him as a symbolic message that I could achieve anything I wanted in life... that I could climb ANY mountain..." The truth is that she was born 5 years before Edmund Hillary climbed Everest. The year she was born, he was an unknown beekeeper.
She is a pinko!

[Plan_B]

For starters
With odds of 250 million to 1, she changed $5,000 into $100,000 by investing in cattle futures.
She tried to give us a Canadian Health Care system.
She hid her Rose Law firm billings from the special prosecutor. Only after the investigation was over did then they magically appear on her table.
She got Bill to pardon all the FALN terrorists to help her get elected by the Puerto Ricans in New York, where she had never lived before.
She can't even tell the truth on her own name. She said she got her name from Sir Edmund Hillary, the first person to climb Mount Everest. She said "her father named her after him as a symbolic message that I could achieve anything I wanted in life... that I could climb ANY mountain..." The truth is that she was born 5 years before Edmund Hillary climbed Everest. The year she was born, he was an unknown beekeeper.
She is a pinko!

So how does the above "list" make her any different then any politician?

If she runs in '08 I will vote for her.

[starfish]

-->

If she runs in '08 I will vote for her.
[/quote]

Why?

<insert witty comment here>

• Back to top

[Asinine]

America would be lucky to have our health care system, but that's a totally different debate.

Here is why i don't like Hillary.

1) She's a woman
2) Look at the faces of the HoR or Congress

Put those two together and you see very clearly that US politics is still an old boys club dominated by white old men. America unlike many other nations is still far too ignorant to elect a woman as president even though i fully believe she would do a much better job than Bush - which unfortunatly isn't saying much.

I also really don't like the way the political landscape is moving in the US. Not sure where I heard or read this, but an interesting point on how the US is moving more and more to a Monarch Empire than a democratic republic.

For instance, lets pretend Clinton's got an outside chance of being prez. come 2008 in reverse order of past presidents:

Clintion
Bush
Clinton
Bush

Not to mention the political power the Kennedy's have held for so long, and not to mention Jeb Bush as a future Republican presidential candidate.

Hillary is great I think, but running her as the democratic presidential candidate I think will ensure another 4 year reign of the inept republican party. Although, I think she would do an excellent job of focusing her politics on domestic issues which have been crippled to finance various interests of "President" George W. Bush.

It really is amazing how America is un-developing itself, at least if you are under the impression that personal freedoms have anything to do with development!

Edited by Asinine, 26 February 2006 - 08:02 PM.

[starfish]

Here is why i don't like Hillary.

1) She's a woman
2) Look at the faces of the HoR or Congress

Put those two together and you see very clearly that US politics is still an old boys club dominated by white old men. America unlike many other nations is still far too ignorant to elect a woman as president even though i fully believe she would do a much better job than Bush - which unfortunatly isn't saying much.

I also really don't like the way the political landscape is moving in the US. Not sure where I heard or read this, but an interesting point on how the US is moving more and more to a Monarch Empire than a democratic republic.

For instance, lets pretend Clinton's got an outside chance of being prez. come 2008 in reverse order of past presidents:

Clintion
Bush
Clinton
Bush


Hillary is great I think, but running her as the democratic presidential candidate I think will ensure another 4 year reign of the inept republican party. Although, I think she would do an excellent job of focusing her politics on domestic issues which have been crippled to finance various interests of "President" George W. Bush.

It really is amazing how America is un-developing itself, at least if you are under the impression that personal freedoms have anything to do with development!

You think Hillary will be better than Bush or any other man? What? How?
The US is moving toward a monarch empire? What?
Domestic issues crippled to finance various interests? What the hell was the drug benefit program but the biggest entitlement program since FDR?
What personal freedoms have you lost?

Liberalism is a mental disorder!

[Plan_B]

--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Plan B @ Feb 26 2006, 10:26 AM) </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->
If she runs in '08 I will vote for her.
Why?

Why not?

[Asinine]

You think Hillary will be better than Bush or any other man? What? How?
The US is moving toward a monarch empire? What?
Domestic issues crippled to finance various interests? What the hell was the drug benefit program but the biggest entitlement program since FDR?
What personal freedoms have you lost?

Liberalism is a mental disorder!

I don't necessarily think that Hillary would be better or worse than "a man", I don't think you could get much worse than Bush - he truly is a incompetant figure head.

Yes, you read that correctly, a monarch empire. A few key families in control of the political destiny enlarging the empire to serve it's own ends. I cite, Iraq (in process), Afghanistan and less so these days, but still - Isreal as countries with incredible ties to the US, or future ties. There are more, of course, and the things too look for are former points of US military deployment and imposed democracy.

Yes domestic issues crippled to finance various interests. I look at 3.X% defecits as a proportion of GDP, i look at the $250 billion cost of the war in Iraq. You cite the drug benefit program and think it's great, well you're wrong it's a band-aid for a heath care system suffering from (metaphorically) cancer.

I have lost no personal freedoms, but I'm Canadian - well that's not true, now in my city of 250,000 people there are some bars where you get frisked before entering, that's new. You are on the verge of phone taps, a new era of religious political corectness, a era where you may not feel safe among your neighbours, where more and more people are owning hand guns (suspicion on my part). How attainable is a high quality college or university education for the average American citizen.

The failure of GWB to address domestic issues and only be a war monger has many less developed nations (i.e. South Korea) looking for the US to step in and solve their problems (North Korea) but this focus on geopolitical stabilization from a country that is hated around the world is leading in large part to the domestic demise of the US.

Now instead of just asking more questions, try and put a whole sentence together to illustrate your point!

[starfish]

Now instead of just asking more questions, try and put a whole sentence together to illustrate your point!

Your personal views and beliefs are based upon contrived falsehoods of accurate information combined with the workings of a schizophrenic imagination. How's that?

Liberalism is a mental disorder!