my car is a '94 n/a manual.
My MAF has gone bad and I am looking for a new or used one-- I checked FCPGroton and they show 2 different sensors.
-An MAF for 93-94 n/a and 95 manuals #0280217002
-and one for 96-97 and 95 w/ auto #1275749
my question is-- will my car run correctly if I install the MAF for the newer cars? I'm guessing no, but I wanna know if I have more options.
thanks, and sorry for the pretty stupid question
0
Maf
Started by Patrick., Mar 20 2006 06:26 PM
-
This topic is locked
6 replies to this topic
#1
Patrick.
-
- Lifetime Supporter
-
- 5,707 posts
Level 5 Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:RI
- Crew:NEC
Posted 20 March 2006 - 06:26 PM
#2
MadeInJapan
-
- Lifetime Supporter
-
- 1,629 posts
Level 3 Member
- Gender:Male
- Interests:Volvo's, computers, DVD's and International Education. Born and raised in Japan
- Location:Knoxville, TN
- Crew:___
Posted 21 March 2006 - 01:04 AM
I think the change over was in '95. Stick with what Groton says....I'd hate for you to put on the wrong MAF. by the way, sometimes you can find these on eBay....much cheaper. I didn't have time and had to buy one from the dealer. After taxes, it was about $200. Sometimes junk yards have them too. Just check around. No sense in buying a new one if you can help it.
'94 850 NA 100K+ miles (Son's beater car)
'98 S70 T-5 AT: Lots of Mods 190K miles- Engine rebuild from TB mishap- all well now.
'04 V70 2.5T AT: A few Mods 101K miles
'91 240 Sedan- Sold 4/21/09
'94 850 Turbo Wagon AT: Gone but not forgotten at 140+K miles
#3
Account_Deleted_T5M
-
- Members
-
- 5,827 posts
I Was Pwned
- Gender:Male
- Location:Central Jersey
- Crew:CFL
Posted 21 March 2006 - 06:11 AM
My last car was a 93 850 glt and when my MAF went bad, I bought a 95' 850 MAF on ebay, and put it on but to my dismay the car ran for a few seconds sputtering black smoke and died so I would go with the 93-94 MAF
--Rob--
--Rob--
Sorry to all the people who are still trying to get their money back.
#4
the underlørd
-
- Moderator
-
- 20,462 posts
Pretty Boy Racing
- Gender:Male
- Location:Seattle
- Crew:NWC
Posted 21 March 2006 - 08:54 AM
put a 95 T5 MAF in my 98 GLT.. worked with no problems..
( i'm just adding that for reference)
( i'm just adding that for reference)
2007.5 Chevy Duramax. Built Tranny. EfiLive. Twin Turbo. 600whp / 1000 ft lbs.
#5
MadeInJapan
-
- Lifetime Supporter
-
- 1,629 posts
Level 3 Member
- Gender:Male
- Interests:Volvo's, computers, DVD's and International Education. Born and raised in Japan
- Location:Knoxville, TN
- Crew:___
Posted 21 March 2006 - 04:08 PM
Yep...the change over was in '95, but Auto and Manual transmissions were treated a bit differently. Go with what groton recommends. They seem to always be on the money for me.
'94 850 NA 100K+ miles (Son's beater car)
'98 S70 T-5 AT: Lots of Mods 190K miles- Engine rebuild from TB mishap- all well now.
'04 V70 2.5T AT: A few Mods 101K miles
'91 240 Sedan- Sold 4/21/09
'94 850 Turbo Wagon AT: Gone but not forgotten at 140+K miles
#6
TheMan5952
-
- Members
-
- 628 posts
Level 2 Member
- Location:Sin City, Nevada
Posted 21 March 2006 - 04:27 PM
That time frame is when the switched from OBDI to OBDII so the sensors are different for that reason.
#7
Patrick.
-
- Lifetime Supporter
-
- 5,707 posts
Level 5 Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:RI
- Crew:NEC
Posted 21 March 2006 - 08:30 PM
thanks gents
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
