Jump to content


FCP Euro

Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Blowoff Valve Threads


  • Please log in to reply
80 replies to this topic

#1 EricF

EricF

    tbricks spy

  • OH Moderator
  • 4235 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St Pete, FL
  • Crew:LBC

Posted 03 January 2008 - 04:10 PM

Look, they're about the most simple device in your engine bay, they don't need to be there for any reasons relating to performance, so any questions regarding their installation, sound, or look, will be moved to the appropriate forum (maintenance, cosmetic, cosmetic, respectively).

Before you lash out in "That's not fair! My question is important too!" see if this answers your question:

Blowoff Valves, and YOU

Blowoff valves do not increase performance.

Blowoff valves release air from your intake system when the throttle is suddenly closed.

Your stock CBV located on your turbo does the same thing.

Blowoff valves simply need to be plumbed into the intake between the turbo and the throttle in some manner, and given a vacuum source behind the throttle body in order to function and be fully installed.

They all sound stupid on an automatic Volvo.



Sorry, but this has gotten out of hand in here! If you have a question about a blowoff valve that isn't answered in this post, please post it in the appropriate forum, NOT performance smile.gif
Posted Image
1984 244 GLT - blue rat rod (SOLD!)
1995 850 turbo - Turbonetics CBB T3/T04E, M56H, KW V2, VEMS Standalone, not as shitty as it looks! (I sell to you for good price?)

"Fish, I love you and respect you very much. But I will kill you dead before this day ends." -Santiago



#2 Zaitz

Zaitz

    Level 3 Member

  • Supporting Member
  • 1829 posts
  • Location:St. Paul, MN
  • Crew:___

Posted 03 January 2008 - 04:36 PM

I dont have a CBV on my turbo.

#3 EricF

EricF

    tbricks spy

  • OH Moderator
  • 4235 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St Pete, FL
  • Crew:LBC

Posted 03 January 2008 - 04:37 PM

QUOTE (Zaitz @ Jan 3 2008, 11:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I dont have a CBV on my turbo.


You are special. If you have upgraded turbos to a different family without integrated CBV and have a question about a BOV, I should reach through the computer and slap you upside your head wink.gif
Posted Image
1984 244 GLT - blue rat rod (SOLD!)
1995 850 turbo - Turbonetics CBB T3/T04E, M56H, KW V2, VEMS Standalone, not as shitty as it looks! (I sell to you for good price?)

"Fish, I love you and respect you very much. But I will kill you dead before this day ends." -Santiago

#4 Jaxx

Jaxx

    Sandy Orangina

  • Supporting Member
  • 9073 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:big red bricks
  • Location:Durham, NC
  • Crew:___

Posted 03 January 2008 - 06:59 PM

CBV does NOT do the same thing. the CBV routes the air back into your intake.

If you're running higher boost than stock, a BOV is good because it won't fall apart after 3 15psi lifts (see cbv)


sure they sound stupid, but they're cool too tongue.gif

Posted Image
Nadine | ME7 S70 T5 601 - sold
Maria Fumaça | 855 T5 418 - dead


#5 EricF

EricF

    tbricks spy

  • OH Moderator
  • 4235 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St Pete, FL
  • Crew:LBC

Posted 03 January 2008 - 07:04 PM

QUOTE (jaxx @ Jan 3 2008, 01:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
CBV does NOT do the same thing. the CBV routes the air back into your intake.

If you're running higher boost than stock, a BOV is good because it won't fall apart after 3 15psi lifts (see cbv)


sure they sound stupid, but they're cool too tongue.gif


OK, so the CBV does the same thing but better.

Oh, and please educate me about running higher boost than stock wink.gif I don't think I've run a 15G at less than 15 psi in the last 4 years, and I have had 15G/16T/19T on: black 855, yellow 854, silver 745, 242 gt, silver 854, platinum 854, white 244... Have probably put like 150k combined miles on Mitsubishi turbos with stock CBV's running over a bar of boost, and have never had one tear in *all of those different cars* ... Note, some of those cars have had replacement used turbos with other used CBV's..

Anyway. If your CBV tears at 15 psi, it was about to fall apart anyway, or it was installed incorrectly or damaged before installation.


Posted Image
1984 244 GLT - blue rat rod (SOLD!)
1995 850 turbo - Turbonetics CBB T3/T04E, M56H, KW V2, VEMS Standalone, not as shitty as it looks! (I sell to you for good price?)

"Fish, I love you and respect you very much. But I will kill you dead before this day ends." -Santiago

#6 Che'_Moderator

Che'_Moderator

    Monkey Master

  • Admin
  • 24627 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Things I am interested in
  • Location:In Your Bushes
  • Crew:___

Posted 03 January 2008 - 07:04 PM

QUOTE (jaxx @ Jan 3 2008, 12:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
CBV does NOT do the same thing. the CBV routes the air back into your intake.

If you're running higher boost than stock, a BOV is good because it won't fall apart after 3 15psi lifts (see cbv)


sure they sound stupid, but they're cool too tongue.gif



CBV Job: Protect the Turbo From Surge
BOV Job: Protect the Turbo From Surge

Sounds the same to me

#7 Jaxx

Jaxx

    Sandy Orangina

  • Supporting Member
  • 9073 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:big red bricks
  • Location:Durham, NC
  • Crew:___

Posted 03 January 2008 - 07:10 PM

QUOTE (Che_Moderator @ Jan 3 2008, 02:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
CBV Job: Protect the Turbo From Surge
BOV Job: Protect the Turbo From Surge

Sounds the same to me


okay okay, the job is the same, but the way they go about doing it is different. how about that? tongue.gif

Posted Image
Nadine | ME7 S70 T5 601 - sold
Maria Fumaça | 855 T5 418 - dead


#8 Che'_Moderator

Che'_Moderator

    Monkey Master

  • Admin
  • 24627 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Things I am interested in
  • Location:In Your Bushes
  • Crew:___

Posted 03 January 2008 - 07:14 PM

QUOTE (jaxx @ Jan 3 2008, 01:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
okay okay, the job is the same, but the way they go about doing it is different. how about that? tongue.gif


I'll be sure to call my girlfriend a hooker later just for you tongue.gif

#9 Zaitz

Zaitz

    Level 3 Member

  • Supporting Member
  • 1829 posts
  • Location:St. Paul, MN
  • Crew:___

Posted 03 January 2008 - 10:18 PM

QUOTE (EricF @ Jan 3 2008, 10:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You are special. If you have upgraded turbos to a different family without integrated CBV and have a question about a BOV, I should reach through the computer and slap you upside your head wink.gif

WOOT! laugh.gif

#10 VS Legend

VS Legend

    Has a Member Title

  • OH Moderator
  • 6917 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Essex, NJ
  • Crew:NEC

Posted 04 January 2008 - 04:17 PM

QUOTE (jaxx @ Jan 3 2008, 02:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
okay okay, the job is the same, but the way they go about doing it is different. how about that? tongue.gif


BOV = PSSSHHHHH!
PSSSHHH != Performance
Unless you are creating some sort of performing BOV orchestra.

In which case, I love you.



2007 Volvo XC70 Daily Driver Steel Cargo Barrier, Cargo Cover, Parrot Bluetooth, USA Spec Adapter w/ Repurposed Mountek nGroove Mount, Pioneer A-Series 6.5" 350W 4-way Door Speakers

#11 exexpat

exexpat

    Projector Gadget

  • OH Moderator
  • 7567 posts
  • Location:Pacific Northwest
  • Crew:NWC

Posted 08 January 2008 - 04:06 AM

BOV's are stupid and belong in my cosmetic forum, exactly like how all wheels/tire changes ever are only for cosmetic reasons.

aka "the Offset Whisperer"

vssig.jpg
I could list every achievement or car part I have installed in my signature, but I won't.


#12 gdizzle

gdizzle

    The Greg

  • OH Moderator
  • 20424 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Music and my family.
  • Location:La Plata, MD
  • Crew:CFL

Posted 09 January 2008 - 03:42 PM

QUOTE (exexpat @ Jan 7 2008, 11:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
BOV's are stupid and belong in my cosmetic forum, exactly like how all wheels/tire changes ever are only for cosmetic reasons.

exactly!
Greg
'98 V70T5M
'74 142

#13 Trunks850R

Trunks850R

    Level 3 Member

  • Supporting Member
  • 1992 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Family, money, cars(in that order)
  • Location:Oak Ridge, TN(Home of the Atomic BomB)
  • Crew:SCC

Posted 15 January 2008 - 08:05 PM

well my Turbo XS RFL isnt blowing off at all, what the hell?????im going to take it apart here in a minute, someone enlighten me before i start a new thread!

<img src="http://i45.photobuck.../trunkssig.jpg" border="0" class="linked-sig-image" />
1997 Volvo 850R. Black on Black. Full Engine and suspension Build. 22 psi with over 300whp.
2004 Volvo S60R. Daily Driver. Turbo Back 3 inch stainless steel exhaust, carbon fiber lip

1998 Volvo S70T5M. 18 inch Pegs, much more to come


#14 ErikS

ErikS

    99.9%

  • Lifetime Supporter
  • 5408 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX
  • Crew:___

Posted 19 January 2008 - 03:06 AM

Are CAI next then?

I picked a pretty circuitous route and arguably cheated slightly, but I'm going to get there
1995 854 T5M Click for Mods
2005 S60 2.5 T

2013 MB GLK 350


#15 Zaitz

Zaitz

    Level 3 Member

  • Supporting Member
  • 1829 posts
  • Location:St. Paul, MN
  • Crew:___

Posted 19 January 2008 - 08:13 AM

QUOTE (el director @ Jan 18 2008, 09:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Are CAI next then?

The argument is there is already a system present that serves a similar purpose - the CBV. Switching to a BOV will not offer any performance increase. However I do agree performance is a better section then cosmetic, purely for the fact that the stock CBV fails and more people are turning to after market turbos where a BOV or diverter valve may be necessary.

#16 EricF

EricF

    tbricks spy

  • OH Moderator
  • 4235 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St Pete, FL
  • Crew:LBC

Posted 19 January 2008 - 09:44 PM

QUOTE (Trunks850R @ Jan 15 2008, 03:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
well my Turbo XS RFL isnt blowing off at all, what the hell?????im going to take it apart here in a minute, someone enlighten me before i start a new thread!


Am I to understand then that it was working before and now it is not? That would mean basically either a siezed valve or a fault in the vacuum source. These are some of the most simple contraptions you will encounter in your automotive tinkering days smile.gif


Posted Image
1984 244 GLT - blue rat rod (SOLD!)
1995 850 turbo - Turbonetics CBB T3/T04E, M56H, KW V2, VEMS Standalone, not as shitty as it looks! (I sell to you for good price?)

"Fish, I love you and respect you very much. But I will kill you dead before this day ends." -Santiago

#17 v4lve

v4lve

    Level 3 Member

  • Lifetime Supporter
  • 1488 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greenwich, CT
  • Crew:NEC

Posted 21 January 2008 - 07:13 PM

wow you guys must hate mk4 vw shows laugh.gif

#18 bdimag

bdimag

    Level 4 Member

  • Gold Member
  • 4683 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Computers, Electronics, Volvos, Audio...
  • Location:Northern, VA
  • Crew:NEC

Posted 29 January 2008 - 07:50 PM

QUOTE (Che_Moderator @ Jan 3 2008, 02:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'll be sure to call my girlfriend a hooker later just for you tongue.gif



huh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif biggrin.gif


so.. what if we install a BOV and have the gas it expells hooked up to a hose that points to the back of the car... that way when it hits, it pushes the car a little... then can we call it performance?

Brian
'91 244 (project: never-gonna-be-finished-because-im-fucking-lazy)
'04 S60 2.5T (dd/old man car) | '92 245 | '02 C70 2.3HPT Coupe


#19 BuDeKai

BuDeKai

    Level 1 Member

  • Lifetime Supporter
  • 486 posts
  • Location:Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • Crew:CFL

Posted 31 January 2008 - 06:59 PM

that will definately work.
2000 S70 NA

Mods
|debadged & blacked out grill|duel rear fogs|

NA and debadged, keep them guessing. don't let them know your slow

#20 kildea

kildea

    Level 1 Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 304 posts
  • Interests:math, physics, chess, firefighting, music ... oh yeah, and hot rods
  • Location:cambridge
  • Crew:NEC

Posted 03 March 2008 - 10:19 PM

QUOTE (Zaitz @ Jan 19 2008, 08:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
... purely for the fact that the stock CBV fails and more people are turning to after market turbos where a BOV or diverter valve may be necessary.


i have an early pierburg cbv now, one of the metal ones from an early redblock turbo (garret) that can be mounted independently anywhere along the pressurized side of the intake.

it cost me a whole $12, and the return hose can be vented to atmosphere like a bov, in the event that the user wants to sound like a pansy.

there are solid stock volvo options that are immune to the "it'll tare" argument and that can be remote mounted (i use a kkk turbo with no integrated cbv), so i think that leaving this discussion OUT of performance makes sense, since it offers only bling + meow to the volvo turbo motor.


5 + 1 =




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

IPD Volvo Parts


Copyright 2012 Volvospeed