Jump to content


FCP Euro

Burn-E

Member Since 24 Sep 2009
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 09:28 PM
-----

Topics I've Started

Text Or Voicemail - Which Do You Prefer?

12 March 2013 - 04:53 PM

There are two kinds of phone users in the world: people who leave voicemails for other people and people who ignore voicemails from other people.

 

Two recent articles echoed the other side of a message I'm hearing from many adults/parents in my generation and older:

 

Disruptions: Digital Era Redefining Etiquette

 

Mobile Etiquette, Don't Leave Me a Voicemail Unless You're Dying

 

Once upon a time an older generation refused to leave a message for a machine because they thought it was rude and impersonal.  People would leave messages saying, "I know you're screening my call" as if this was a bad thing.

 

Now we have an older generation that is befuddled with how texting has become the norm, how many they are trying to reach refuse to answer their phones or even listen to voicemail but instead will only respond to texting or email.  We have teenagers who will sit in a room together and rather than talk to each other will text.

 

So are the tides shifting?  Has the form of communication become texting as the primary means of casual connection?  When is it appropriate and when is it not to leave a voicemail?

 

Are there some conversations that really ought to happen by real, actual, conversation?  Like breaking up with someone as a for instance.  Have we reached a stage where real conversation only happens in certain situations and much of life is governed 140 characters at a time?

 

Answer the questions, read the articles, and then let's hear your thoughts.

 

A few anecdotes to reveal my own thoughts:

 

1. I used to work for a boss who lived via voicemail.  He was the President and Founding Partner of our firm and would leave multiple 5 minute long voicemail messages on our office voicemail system - a system which had no notification service so there was no way - if you were out of the office - to know he had left you a message unless you checked your voicemail frequently.  He basically used voicemail like anyone else today uses email - to communicate important details and messages and dictate changes to projects and reports - and he would group send voicemails. It would drive me nuts because I had to carefully rewind and rewind until I had the full dictation of what he was trying to communicate.  We often asked why he doesn't just email and his comment was generally, I'm calling you in the few minutes I have between activities and it's much more practical for me to just call and leave messages rather than trying to type something up on the small screen of a phone or crack open my laptop (something he rarely carried if he was traveling).

 

2. My younger brother (8 years younger) will in general never answer the phone if you call him - even if you know he's not engaged in anything at the time - and refuses to call back even if you leave him a message.  But email him or text him and you'll very likely get a response back.  And the only times I call him are when there is something important to share.

 

3. I have a coworker, who when I'm trying to connect with her on important details refuses to answer my calls and when I leave a voicemail or when she calls me back she'll say, "No, I didn't listen to my voicemail."  So I've learned to only text her or send emails because she doesn't respond to the phone.

 

4. Don't call me on my office line.  If you do, don't expect me to listen to or respond to the voicemail if you leave it.  The only people who call me on the office line are sales people or recruiters.  If I'm available I'll answer that phone for someone within the company but generally I am not.  My mobile number is widely available to anyone in the company through Lync and our Exchange system.  Call me on that and if I'm available I'll always answer - otherwise leave a message and I'll check it as soon as I can.  Better yet, if it's critical, unless I'm not online, ping me on Lync or send me an email if it's not critical.  Texting will always get my immediate attention unless I'm in the midst of a meeting and then it's just as likely to be seen as a voicemail - not until after I'm available.


Car Chasers - Flipping Cars

11 March 2013 - 03:40 PM

Anyone else watching this new show on CNBC? 

 

http://www.cnbc.com/...Inside_the_Show

 

Watched half an episode last week and it's shaping up as a potential prime slot on the DVR for me.  Lots of American muscle cars, old classics, and enough Euro to keep it interesting.  Love watching the flip mentality and the constant search for a must have car to rebuild and take to auction with all the logic that goes into why any particular vehicle might or might have value.

 

Amazed at how little some of these cars go for like the 308 GTBi - and had to laugh at the commentary on one of the Ferrari forums that surfaced around that episode:

 

http://www.ferrarich...m-premiere.html

 

I'm wondering how much of this is Matt B's daily life. :lol:


Restroom Privacy - Which Stall Do You Sit In And Other Questions?

06 February 2013 - 03:17 PM

Well folks, it's time for another bodily functions and restroom habits poll.  We now know whether you sit or stand and whether you fold or crinkle.  Now we want to know how you choose your stall and the thought process that goes through your head as you contemplate specific scenarios.

 

Please make sure to explain your rationale for your choices in the comments below.  And if you happen to have any great stories about how you scared the shit out of some lady while using the toilet or had the shit scared out of you (Alden) please do feel free to share so we can all laugh at you with you. :lol:


Lance Armstrong - Why Confess Now?

15 January 2013 - 11:09 PM

I'll admit, I'm baffled by his decision to come clean.  He clearly believes he can come out on top with this decision to go on the offense here with Oprah rather than taking it to the mattresses as he has attempted to do for the last 13 years.  At least he was consistent in lying - he had that much going for him.  Everyone who was winning was doping during that era and I'm not entirely convinced that the doping has diminished since then.

 

So thoughts?  Is this a situation where a fighter's competitive spirit winds up being his undoing?  Does he really believe they're going to give him a slap on the hand and allow him to race again?  It's clear this is going to cost him tens of millions of dollars when all the lawsuits are done being paid.  And he may just do time for perjury too.

 

Armstrong is a fraud, he has always been one since he started competing at the international level.  Yes he was a great rider but his brand and his victories are founded on a fraud.  Maybe doping should just be part of the sport and we allow that enhancing the human body is what we do now.  But until society accepts that this is the case - I don't agree with the philosophy, there is a bright line between training regimens and directly altering the body through medical intervention of any type - then doping is cheating.

 

Comparatively, I think the best evidence out there for how to handle something like this was the unwillingness of the voters this year to put Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens into the Baseball Hall of Fame.


T5M C/s/v70 P80 Production Numbers From Vcna - The Definitive List

20 December 2012 - 04:46 PM

This question gets asked regularly enough and the myths get tossed around or the numbers are guessed.  This may turn me into the resident statistician but since I track these cars I thought it would be useful to specify production numbers for the T5M and where known, the T5 for P80 / Gen 1 model years.  Various threads have answered for a specific model or a specific MY but none have tackled this comprehensively.

 

What is listed are validated numbers provided by VCNA in response to questions various enthusiasts have posted to them over the years.  These are USA numbers to the best of my knowledge except where noted.  If you have numbers that can fill in the gaps please share.  I searched extensively across the various enthusiast sites to gather what is listed here.

 

For USA - numbers from VCNA:

Model Total T5 / T5M

V70:
1998: ? / 127
1999: 517 / 101
2000: 3 / 0

S70:
1998: ? / 361
1999: ? / 197
2000: ? / 75

C70:
Coupes: 135 T5M across 98-02 / 603 worldwide
Verts: ?

Sources:
http://forums.swedes....Specifications

http://forums.swedes...42fffe233df0324
http://volvospeed.co....ction-numbers/
http://volvospeed.co....ction-numbers/
http://forums.swedes....ic-C70-history


IPD Volvo Parts


Copyright 2012 Volvospeed