Jump to content
Volvospeed Forums

lengendsecko87

Members
  • Posts

    700
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lengendsecko87

  1. Anybody have any advise on this picture?

    4901640803_1293fe7211_b.jpg

    I just got CS5 and Lightroom 3 and I've been playing around. What I'm trying to get the orange out from her hair to make it less...orange. I tried to get a lot of the detail from what was burnt out back by burning, but I had no success as it was far gone and I don't know any tricks to isolate it without making it look too burnt in.

  2. It's not a very interesting photo to be honest, it just look like snapshot taken out of the window of a house. The power lines bisecting the trees don't draw your eye away from any rement of asethetics in the photo. The raised blacks pull all the detail out of the trees. The tree on the left has been cut off at the top as well, and the colors are really flat. Just my opinion.

    The only interesting thing about it is that the sun was red at the moment. Other then that, it's not that great of a picture. I wish I had an SLR on me.

  3. Light Room 3 does a much better job at pulling detail back into overexposed areas w/o greying them out. If you're using gimp, that's fine, but step up to a real editing/work-flow software.

    It's a tough shot due to the harsh mid day lighting, if he were to take a stop of light out, I think the baby's face would be a stop and half underexposed. Although, that's much easier to correct in post.

    I probably should setup up, but I don't have the budget for it. Having Photoshop/Lightroom would be amazing, but I just don't have the money to spend on it :P And I would rather get it legally then a cracked torrent version or something.

    That is what I was thinking. Even if it's underexposed, you can brighten it up. If its overexposed/underexposed, detail is gone and it's just white/black :P

  4. If it's too far gone probably not. Would end up just looking grey instead of white. Doesn't have the skin tone you'd want. If it's too over exposed there isn't anything to work with for burning.

    The shot was done at

    F/7.1

    ISO100

    1/200"

    So I could have stepped it down to stop overexposure?

  5. Whenever you take a portrait, the head must be in a clean spot. The baby has a railing and a pole sticking out of his head. Also, the face is of the woman is overexposed. Otherwise, the comp is good.

    Thanks! I'll take them into mind. I've only really taken one photography class. I never really got "formal" traning, thanks for the advise though! I'm still a amateur.

    As for the woman's face, could I just burn it more in Gimp?

  6. No problem, I definitely wasn't the first. I just like the look of it, especially on wider crops.

    4795088225_7ea5141528_b.jpg

    it just gave it a nice look to it. My recent trip to California, it's my cousin with her son. Taken with a Nikon D40X. Totally not used to Nikon :D

×
×
  • Create New...