Norway, Denmark, Finland, Germany, etc. have free education and nationalized healthcare as well. The reason the refugees can go there is the open immigration policy that Sweden had until recently. The only reason I say they are better off in Sweden is because I am half Swedish and I love that country. I think they would be better off in many European countries than they would be here for reasons like welfare and it is just easier to migrate to countries that are closer to where you are. However, I think we should shoulder the burden of allowing refugees to settle here. If you compare this war's refugees to Vietnam, you will see that we are much more strict about refugees. That can be attributed to many reasons including the current administration's homeland security policies, but the number of South Vietnamese civilians that we were able to settle in the United States is much higher than the 6000 Iraqis we have let into our country. Why not allow those who "welcomed us as liberators" to migrate here and leave the ones that shoot at us there? Sweden absorbed 30,000 Iraqis without any problems. That would be like New York City (just the five boroughs not the entire metro area) absorbing that many refugees population wise. Surely the United States could absorb more refugees than Sweden without hurting our economy.