White850T5's right...I did a paper last year on Old Sparky and learned a lot about the death penalty. It does cost taxpayers more to put a man to death. And for our satisfaction, u'd rather see someone die than live. But if u were the killer...would u rather be put to death, or sit in prison for 20, 30, 40, 50 years...I'd rather die. So keeping them in prison punishes them more than the death penalty...and from my research, a lot of people are against the use of old sparky b/c when it was brought back into use b/c of several botched executions in '99 and 2000 in Florida. Witness claimed the execution was inhumane and too painful for the executee. But look at other legalized death penalties in other countries. Flaying, hanging, throwing from a high cliff into spikes or rocks, stoning, drawing and quartering, burning at the stake, crucifiction...some of the most unimaginable death penalties are still legal and practiced in some countries worldwide. As Americans, we would never do such a thing...but w/ that in mind, as the US holds its reputation to the rest of the world...enforcing the death penalty wouldn't hold up our respectable way the world percepts us. Yes much of the world hates us, but a big part of it is b/c they see us as being better. It would be very...contradictory to enforce the death penalty more than we do. If u want to truly punish someone, u gotta do torture. And in the US, torture just ain't gonna happen.