Che'_Moderator Posted December 9, 2004 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 ok, that begs the question, If you're at the top, I'm gonna guess Rich is your #2 man... who's 3? ←1. Rich/Myself2. OH Mods3. Mods4. Monkeys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jross Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 I wasn't criticizing the "security rounds", I just didn't like the guy's attitude.←I don't think anyone did O_oI know I was trying to point out the propaganda war everyone's in denial about. I don't think any of us "hippies" said the troops were in the wrong. It's combat, and the Iraqi combatants were just that -- combatants. You pick up a gun, you monkey with us, we monkey you back, and if we didn't, we monkeyed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeachRat Posted December 10, 2004 Report Share Posted December 10, 2004 I don't think anyone did O_oI know I was trying to point out the propaganda war everyone's in denial about. I don't think any of us "hippies" said the troops were in the wrong. It's combat, and the Iraqi combatants were just that -- combatants. You pick up a gun, you monkey with us, we monkey you back, and if we didn't, we monkeyed up.←And if the Iraqis have internet blogging, I'm sure somebody in Arabic is typing about putting a few extra AK rounds in an American to be sure he's dead. Like Mr Admin said, there are two sides, yours and theirs. However, all you really see is the flash of the muzzle from the guy shooting at you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jross Posted December 10, 2004 Report Share Posted December 10, 2004 And if the Iraqis have internet blogging, I'm sure somebody in Arabic is typing about putting a few extra AK rounds in an American to be sure he's dead. Like Mr Admin said, there are two sides, yours and theirs. However, all you really see is the flash of the muzzle from the guy shooting at you.←Whoops, re-reading I think I got misinterpreted. "I don't think anyone did" was aimed at "I wasn't criticizing [...]", not "I just didn't [...]". And there's more than two sides. There's alot of people who think this whole war bit is nonesense... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnthonyR Posted December 10, 2004 Report Share Posted December 10, 2004 ok, that begs the question, If you're at the top, I'm gonna guess Rich is your #2 man... who's 3? ←It's either me or Joe, but I vote for me seriously, who do you think made JHE an OH (I'll give you one guess... me!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fromtheshadows Posted December 11, 2004 Report Share Posted December 11, 2004 nice discussion. theres a fire in here. i wouldve shot him. out of fear for my own life and my company. That soldier did his job. You cant expect a kid trained to be a killing machine to make a perfect calculated decision in war, theres no time to calculate, youll end up a statistic. And as far as war crimes, I think the playing field should be fair, meaning that if your enemy will stop at nothing, the definition of what a war crime is should be rethought. That said, I still think this war is a travesty, a misuse of power and my tax dollars. i cant stand THE MAN. (not you volvospeed admin) down with the man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jester1182 Posted December 11, 2004 Report Share Posted December 11, 2004 They're Called Security Rounds In response to the news blurb about the Marine who put two rounds in a wounded insurgent's head in Fallujah, here's a response from a Marine: It's a safety issue pure and simple. After assaulting through a target, put a security round in everybody's head. Sorry al-Reuters, there's no paddy wagon rolling around Fallujah picking up "prisoners" and offering them a hot cup a joe, falafel, and a blanket. There's no time to dick around in the target, you clear the space, dump the chumps, and move on.org. Are Corpsman expected to treat wounded terrorists? Negative. Hey libs, worried about the defense budget? Well, it would be waste, fraud, and abuse for a Corpsman to spend one man minute or a battle dressing on a terrorist, its much cheaper to just spend the $.02 on a 5.56mm FMJ. By the way, terrorists who chop off civilian's heads are not prisoners, they are carcasses. UPDATE: Let me be very clear about this issue. I have looked around the web, and many people get this concept, but there are some stragglers. Here is your situation Marine. You just took fire from unlawful combatants shooting from a religious building attempting to use the sanctuary status of their position as protection. But you're in Fallujah now, and the Marine Corps has decided that they're not playing that game this time. That was Najaf. So you set the mosque on fire and you hose down the terrorists with small arms, launch some AT-4s, some 40MM grenades into the building and things quiet down. So you run over there, and find some tangos wounded and pretending to be dead. You are aware that suicide martyrdom is like really popular with these kinds of idiots, and like taking some Marines with them would be really cool. So you can either risk your life and your fire team's lives by having them cover you while you bend down and search a guy that you think is pretending to be dead for some reason. Also, you don't know who or what is in the next room, and you're already speaking English to each other and its loud because your hearing is poor from shooting people for several days. So you know that there are many other rooms to enter, and that if anyone is still alive in those rooms, they know that Americans are in the mosque. Meanwhile (3 seconds later), you still have this terrorist that was just shooting at you from a mosque playing possum. What do you do? You double tap his head, and you go to the next room, that's what. What about the Geneva Conventions and all that Law of Land Warfare stuff? What about it. Without even addressing the issues at hand you first thought should be, "I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6." Bear in mind that this is a perpetual mindset that in reinforced by experience on a minute by minute basis. Secondly, you are fighting an unlawful combatant in a Sanctuary which is a double No No on his part. Third, tactically you are in no position to take "prisoners" because there are more rooms to search and clear, and the behavior of said terrorist indicates that he is up to no good. No good in Fallujah is a very large place and the low end of no good and the high end of no good are fundamentally the same... Marines get hurt or die. So there is no compelling reason for you to do anything but double tap this idiot and get on with the mission. If you are a veteran then everything I have just written is self evident, if you are not a veteran than at least try to put yourself in the situation. Remember, in Fallujah there is no yesterday, there is no tomorrow, there is only now. Right NOW. Have you ever lived in NOW for a week? It is not easy, and if you have never lived in NOW for longer than it takes to finish the big roller coaster at Six Flags, then shut your hole about putting Marines in jail for war crimes. Be advised, I am not talking to my readers, but if this post gets linked up, I want regular folks to get this message loud and clear. Froggy OUT. Good blogs...My 2 cents. If some one breaks into your house with a gun and pops a shot at you are you gonna shoot back if you have a firearm? If you don't your a fool, for those of you who can read what if you wound him? Armed robber laying on your floor bleeding and he refuses to throw out his weapon. I hope you see where I am going with this.←where was the original article? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Che'_Moderator Posted December 11, 2004 Author Report Share Posted December 11, 2004 where was the original article?←ABC News.... Go figure Ah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DougK Posted December 17, 2004 Report Share Posted December 17, 2004 Very intresting... agree with you a 100 percent.Better him than me... that attitude is fine by me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeskier8585 Posted December 18, 2004 Report Share Posted December 18, 2004 or better him than your men.... if he was thinking something it think it would be that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drPheta Posted December 24, 2004 Report Share Posted December 24, 2004 This liberal agrees with company safety. Good post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyby Posted January 31, 2005 Report Share Posted January 31, 2005 Good stuff. I think his attitude is the way it is, because he probably told someone this and they exploded... It happened to my friend at a debate at our college... Someone said, "well have you fought in a war? huh huh huh?" I thought it was over, he said "actually yes! I just got back a month ago... I held friends dying in my arms, saw kids my age get their legs blown off... yes, I have fought in a war, and how dare you treat me, my fellow soldiers that are still over there, and your country like that."None of us know what really goes on in war (assuming there are no Vets here). But I know a few people, and they HATE talking about it. This guy was about to kick his (Filter is smarter than me) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts