kenhoeve Posted June 23, 2005 Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 (edited) your land? not if mr. developer has something to say about it...urban development coming your way? you might be more screwed than you think...This is absolutely unbelievable. I am literally sick to my stomach. Edited June 23, 2005 by kenhoeve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Che'_Moderator Posted June 23, 2005 Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 Malformed URLs make Shaddy cry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beachnut Posted June 23, 2005 Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 Wow ... the things I could do with a tongue like that ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenhoeve Posted June 23, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 fixed. shaddy, quit your whining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Che'_Moderator Posted June 23, 2005 Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 Shaddy thinks he smells patchouli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteT5 Posted June 23, 2005 Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 5th amendment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenhoeve Posted June 23, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 5th amendment←So what exactly is your point? I'm aware of the 5th amendment, and the fact it was considered in this case. The ambiguity of the phrase "public use" is what is being assailed.Just because you are building new stuff does not make it "public use". It's called "corporate use".The primary problem here is yet another tipping of the power scale. More power for the wealthy to influence government and screw everyone else.Charles that was low. But I'm impressed you knew what I used in my dreads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Che'_Moderator Posted June 23, 2005 Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 The primary problem here is yet another tipping of the power scale. More power for the wealthy to influence government and screw everyone else.Charles that was low. But I'm impressed you knew what I used in my dreads.←ROFL.Dreads LOL. The fact MJs not it prision should have already taught you that laws do not apply to the powerful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteT5 Posted June 23, 2005 Report Share Posted June 23, 2005 So what exactly is your point? I'm aware of the 5th amendment, and the fact it was considered in this case. The ambiguity of the phrase "public use" is what is being assailed.Just because you are building new stuff does not make it "public use". It's called "corporate use".The primary problem here is yet another tipping of the power scale. More power for the wealthy to influence government and screw everyone else.←True, didn't read the whole article the first time. It doesn't make me happy even when they do it just to build another highway to relieve traffic congestion, but what they've done here just seems like they're letting bullying take place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DougK Posted June 27, 2005 Report Share Posted June 27, 2005 So what exactly is your point? I'm aware of the 5th amendment, and the fact it was considered in this case. The ambiguity of the phrase "public use" is what is being assailed.Just because you are building new stuff does not make it "public use". It's called "corporate use".The primary problem here is yet another tipping of the power scale. More power for the wealthy to influence government and screw everyone else.←Man I couldn't agree with you more. 1000000000x agreement here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InlineTurbo Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 Wow, found an issue I agree with Ken on! Yet another ruling without a Constitutional leg to stand on.Now you know what most of us feel like when we hear of the Constitutional shredding decision of the week from the Supreme Farce. Maybe you should consider this when it comes to putting people on the Supreme Court. Notice that all of the people that side with what the Constitution "says" and not what they "feel" it should say were in the dissent. Including the hated by liberals Scalia, Thomas and Renquist. Yet another power grab by the big government camp. Glad I don't live on land that Pfizer wants. Be very afraid if you live in California. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zimmy77 Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 it seems that when it comes to the almighty tax dollar, the government will do what it takes "for the public good". and they'll let you know what's good for you and what's bad for you. nothing like moving out of your parents house so you can make your own decisions, just so the government can do it for you because you're not capable of doing it yourself. that goes for smoking, drugs, medicine(vioxx, etc), fast food, television, dodgeball, and duck duck gray duck. never blame yourself when you can blame it on others and get money for it by sueing them for not taking into account your potential for stupidity.... ..... sorry for the rant. as I was trying to say, it's pretty BS that a state can now allow any company to take your little piece of heaven for "just compensation" just because it may provide a couple of jobs and tax revenues. I dont agree with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Franke Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 Check out this article on the new eminent domain, it is a must read: http://www.freenation.tv/hotellostliberty2.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenhoeve Posted June 28, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 Check out this article on the new eminent domain, it is a must read: http://www.freenation.tv/hotellostliberty2.html← OMG, that would be the most righteous infliction of retribution ever.Wonder if there is any chance of zoning his land commercial. Must donate. The guy is loaded and would just find a new place anyway, but it would definitely ruffle some feathers and most importantly, get PRESS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InlineTurbo Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 Check out this article on the new eminent domain, it is a must read: http://www.freenation.tv/hotellostliberty2.html←Saw that earlier today. That would be the best case of irony ever. They need to go after the other 4 in my humble opinion too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts