HeavyIron Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Ok, so here is the deal. I was already suspect of my wastegate actuator going into this, but really wanted to see where I was at. I was surprised by the horsepower number and dissapointed by the torque. I was especially surprised at where in the powerband the #'s came. To convert kilopascals to pounds per square inch, divide the kpa value by 2 and then again by 6.9 I am kicking myself in the ass for forgetting my video camera, but I am going back in two weeks for a retest I am open for comments, hypothesis, or ideas for why they turned out the way they did. final result was 294hp @6900 rpm & 293 torque @4400rpm All this while holding only 16 psi of boost. I had one initial spike to 20psi that faded fast. I eill be getting my new actuator and stronger CBV spring next week. BTW, Mustangs run about 8% more conservative than a Dynojet. Ok, so page one is upside down and the editor will not work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmelviØØ7 Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 NICE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookforjoe Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Nice WHP - odd that the torque numbers are not higher... I'd like to see the graph rightside up - can you repost it? Rather rich AFR's, probably could get quite a bit more out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greekone Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Nice HP numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum 850 Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Great numbers. I would like to see the chart right side up as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Riker Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Nice work!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maciekb2002 Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 What tune are you running, It looks pretty good! Can you drive your car normally, or Like I had to before , full throttle or no throttle ? I am going back to dyno after installing adj . press regulator , that will be probably next week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Those are nice numbers, as you know, never be dissappointed by numbers on a mustang. I am sure that turbo won't even start to make happy numbers til you turn it up. Other than the engine build maybe changing rotating mass alittle, the reason for the build was to turn it up Im sure. mid 20 psi and lets see then. Assuming the car is on pump gas, e85 would wake that tq up alot to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaitz Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Ok, so here is the deal. I was already suspect of my wastegate actuator going into this, but really wanted to see where I was at. I was surprised by the horsepower number and dissapointed by the torque. I was especially surprised at where in the powerband the #'s came. To convert kilopascals to pounds per square inch, multiply the kpa value by .14503773773020923 I am kicking myself in the ass for forgetting my video camera, but I am going back in two weeks for a retest I am open for comments, hypothesis, or ideas for why they turned out the way they did. final result was 294hp @6900 rpm & 293 torque @4400rpm All this while holding only 16 psi of boost. I had one initial spike to 20psi that faded fast. I eill be getting my new actuator and stronger CBV spring next week. BTW, Mustangs run about 8% more conservative than a Dynojet. Ok, so page one is upside down and the editor will not work. Not according to Dublin. Nice numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeavyIron Posted October 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Ok, so here is the deal. I was already suspect of my wastegate actuator going into this, but really wanted to see where I was at. I was surprised by the horsepower number and dissapointed by the torque. I was especially surprised at where in the powerband the #'s came. To convert kilopascals to pounds per square inch, multiply the kpa value by .14503773773020923 I am kicking myself in the ass for forgetting my video camera, but I am going back in two weeks for a retest I am open for comments, hypothesis, or ideas for why they turned out the way they did. final result was 294hp @6900 rpm & 293 torque @4400rpm All this while holding only 16 psi of boost. I had one initial spike to 20psi that faded fast. I eill be getting my new actuator and stronger CBV spring next week. BTW, Mustangs run about 8% more conservative than a Dynojet. Ok, so page one is upside down and the editor will not work. What tune are you running, It looks pretty good! Can you drive your car normally, or Like I had to before , full throttle or no throttle ? I am going back to dyno after installing adj . press regulator , that will be probably next week I am running an MTE tune that Marco put together for me. Car is very drivable. Tranny downshifts at the first breath of boost and the engine pulls strong to 7k. Can be abrupt on the transitions sometimes. For instance today I was rounding an on-ramp in the rain and I pushed on the throttle (lightly I thought) next thing I know the tach is showing 6k and the car is understeering badly into the corner with the inside tireing smoking viciously. Gotta remember drving on egg shells in corners Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbor850 Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Nice WHP - odd that the torque numbers are not higher... Rather rich AFR's, probably could get quite a bit more out of it. I agree, but who knows, maybe he is running a good amount of timing . . . rich a/f = more timing | lean a/f = less timing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duke of cruel Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Nice figures m8, but i would also go for a/r of 11,5 to 11,8 for more power. What cams are you running? DoC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B Mac Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Holy HP batman! What turbo are you using that pulls like that to 7 grand? Congrats on good numbers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricF Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Wonderful results! For a comparison, my 13.3 at 107 setup made ~250 whp on 14-15 psi with the 19T... It was at 22-23 psi that I was trapping 107. I could see 110-112 trap speeds in your future without a turbo upgrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FCP Euro Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Really nice numbers you have there. Also nice to see the graph right side up. Anyway, definitely run more boost on her. From the look of the AFs, you could easily get over 300 WHP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.