Fudge_Brownie Posted March 23, 2011 Report Share Posted March 23, 2011 Seeing as how the gains were pretty apparent both on the dyno and at the drag strip, I'm gonna have to assume you have no idea what you're talking about here. Can you elaborate please? I don't see any dyno numbers, plots, or ET's in this thread. What numbers are you refering to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
850wagonT5 Posted March 24, 2011 Report Share Posted March 24, 2011 Can you elaborate please? I don't see any dyno numbers, plots, or ET's in this thread. What numbers are you refering to? I'm referring to 3 cars I've personally owned/built/raced in the last few years. All 3 were boosted (2 turbo, 1 S/C), all 3 were dyno'd more than once, 2 were tracked. All 3 saw more WHP/WTQ on 100+ octane fuel compared to CA 91 octane with no tuning changes, and the 2 that were tracked picked up AT LEAST 2.5mph at the trap. I don't need to bother posting anything else as if you do your own legwork, you should find plenty more that supports those findings - including at least 2 published dyno tests in popular magazines that I can recall off hand, and likely dozens on other forums like this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
850wagonT5 Posted March 24, 2011 Report Share Posted March 24, 2011 I'm referring to 3 cars I've personally owned/built/raced in the last few years. All 3 were boosted (2 turbo, 1 S/C), all 3 were dyno'd more than once, 2 were tracked. All 3 saw more WHP/WTQ on 100+ octane fuel compared to CA 91 octane with no tuning changes, and the 2 that were tracked picked up AT LEAST 2.5mph at the trap. I don't need to bother posting anything else as if you do your own legwork, you should find plenty more that supports those findings - including at least 2 published dyno tests in popular magazines that I can recall off hand, and likely dozens on other forums like this one. I should note, all 3 of these cars had some sort of "tune" (advanced timing) and higher than stock boost. I should note, all 3 of these cars had some sort of "tune" (advanced timing) and higher than stock boost. And your little negative things on this site are adorable. Do you guys not like facts here?! lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fudge_Brownie Posted March 24, 2011 Report Share Posted March 24, 2011 And your little negative things on this site are adorable. Do you guys not like facts here?! lol. For the record, they werent me, but they could be for any reason. Like maybe how you sound like a condescending douche despite the possibility your facts are valid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Che'_Moderator Posted March 24, 2011 Report Share Posted March 24, 2011 One of the -1s was from me for this little gem: I should note, all 3 of these cars had some sort of "tune" (advanced timing) and higher than stock boost. All 3 saw more WHP/WTQ on 100+ octane fuel compared to CA 91 octane with no tuning changes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.