caanglin Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 Including subcontracting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Che'_Moderator Posted February 19, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 Including subcontracting. So no, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fudge_Brownie Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 Including subcontracting.Even if you do count all those, are they all located in CO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burn-E Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 In the escalation of arms, next thing you know they'll be banning assault knives... That's not a knife....THAT'S a knife. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
550 Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 In the escalation of arms, next thing you know they'll be banning assault knives... That's not a knife....THAT'S a knife. Already Banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fudge_Brownie Posted February 19, 2013 Report Share Posted February 19, 2013 In the escalation of arms, next thing you know they'll be banning assault knives... That's not a knife....THAT'S a knife. I just happened to watch CNN Video about the article linked. Patel's a badass. Unfortunately, all I could think was next time they'll come back with a gun or a couple guys. He'll probably still have his trusty sword. His shop is in a wonderful part of town. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caanglin Posted February 20, 2013 Report Share Posted February 20, 2013 Magpul employees approximately 200. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Che'_Moderator Posted February 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2013 Magpul employees approximately 200. Of which about a third are full time, and I have no idea what percent are in CO. That aside, the law does not require them to move or stop production. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caanglin Posted February 20, 2013 Report Share Posted February 20, 2013 They said they wouldn't fell right making a product in a state where the residents couldn't purchase it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Che'_Moderator Posted February 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2013 They said they wouldn't fell right making a product in a state where the residents couldn't purchase it. Its a good thing they are a private company. Other wise they would have a new CEO. They can make everything they make now AND exploit the new 15rd market about to open up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyfishing3 Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 you gun guys think this is ok? http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/02/21/4634323/garland-boy-3-dies-after-being.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
550 Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Irresponsible gun owners. Tragic accident obvoiusly. However, who had access, and why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fudge_Brownie Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 you gun guys think this is ok? http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/02/21/4634323/garland-boy-3-dies-after-being.htmlSure, that's fine. I also like killing kittens in my spare time. People who think guns should stick around want little children to die.How do we stop that from happening again, besides banning pistols completely. Unless that's what you're trying to say? And do you really think a 3 year old in a household with a loaded gun laying around is safe without the gun? Yes removing the gun drops the chances of him dying from gunshot, but does it noticeably improve the odds of him leaving to see 18? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyfishing3 Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 too many guns= too many tragedy's. don't you guys get tired of saying, "" yeah, thats a tragedy but....""" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
550 Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Nope, because far more guns are owned than tragedies happening. Or should I say, the tragedies happening with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts