Jump to content
Volvospeed Forums

Upgraded Front Motor Mount


Brad850

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

And since nobody wanted to look up part # to find the answer, part# 8631702 is the 302 version. If you look at IPD they list the mount they sell are the 288 version, (8631698, 9141257, 9209869 8631698V, 8631698, 9141257, 9209869).

It's in my first post? I realize they have different part numbers. My question was will it fit/ are the bolt holes different, and if anyone has installed the 8631702 on an 850 or older s70.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

or you can spend $90 or so on a nrg engine torque damper on fleabay, drill a couple holes in the plate that mounts to the strut brace and cut the other bracket to mount behind PS pump. then you wont ever have to worry about excessive engine movement or replace the crappy mount. I did this for Ryan (hotpantslovebug) and myself. solid investment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oCEjs1W.jpg

http://www.ebay.com/itm/180827186476?_trksid=p2059210.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&rmvSB=true

Will blow any OEM mount otta the water. Shifts are a lot smoother. swap different rubber/poly bushing out for hardness. I've run both and have had no issues. You get minor feedback from the rack but mine went away after a month or so. One shitty oem mount at the bottom of the engine does not cut it. Well worth the money/minor modifications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The right side mount ( ft of the engine) supports the weight of the motor, doesn't limit engine movement on accel or braking.

The mount that hotpantslovebug shows acts as as the upper mount does, to control engine torque under load.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or you can spend $90 or so on a nrg engine torque damper on fleabay, drill a couple holes in the plate that mounts to the strut brace and cut the other bracket to mount behind PS pump. then you wont ever have to worry about excessive engine movement or replace the crappy mount. I did this for Ryan (hotpantslovebug) and myself. solid investment

As the others said, this only limits torque movement. I put one of those on back when I built my current motor, and with 450AWHP, I still tore the front (under crank) mount off the bonded base.

81269D45-E2AB-40F5-BC7A-E81EDE7B2DCC_zps

My solution for that issue is wiring the mount.

null_zps30943da4.jpg

Instead of window -weld, I use strips of silicnone couplers wedged into the open cavities of the stock torque mounts under & on the firewall

IMG_2331a_zpsf9cea688.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

As the others said, this only limits torque movement. I put one of those on back when I built my current motor, and with 450AWHP, I still tore the front (under crank) mount off the bonded base.

81269D45-E2AB-40F5-BC7A-E81EDE7B2DCC_zps

My solution for that issue is wiring the mount.

null_zps30943da4.jpg

Instead of window -weld, I use strips of silicnone couplers wedged into the open cavities of the stock torque mounts under & on the firewall

IMG_2331a_zpsf9cea688.jpg

 

you were the source of the idea for me and hotpantslovebug to install one of these. im not saying it takes the mount completely out of the picture, it still obviously serves a purpose. but it does increase the life span of it (for those of us who aren't making 400+whp) by reducing engine movement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you were the source of the idea for me and hotpantslovebug to install one of these. im not saying it takes the mount completely out of the picture, it still obviously serves a purpose. but it does increase the life span of it (for those of us who aren't making 400+whp) by reducing engine movement

Yes, it does serve a purpose, and it should increase the life span of that lower mount :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...