Jump to content
Volvospeed Forums

My T4


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 381
  • Created
  • Last Reply

vulvas40t4 wrote on Tue, 14 December 2010 13:39

So its this turbo or with tial turbine side? Which a/r size will you choose for turbine (0.63a/r or 0.82a/r)?

Same core as on that link, but I believe he is using the same turbine housing, Tial V-Band .63 A/R , and same compressor housing Very Happy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

arrtchiu wrote on Tue, 14 December 2010 07:45

vulvas40t4 wrote on Tue, 14 December 2010 13:39
So its this turbo or with tial turbine side? Which a/r size will you choose for turbine (0.63a/r or 0.82a/r)?

Same core as on that link, but I believe he is using the same turbine housing, Tial V-Band .63 A/R , and same compressor housing Very Happy

Yes turbine side fits directly to that new core and also compressor housing needs to be changed because bigger compressor wheel. Tcode what fuel did you use when dynoing? What RON?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vulvas40t4 wrote on Tue, 14 December 2010 06:48

Yes turbine side fits directly to that new core and also compressor housing needs to be changed because bigger compressor wheel. Tcode what fuel did you use when dynoing? What RON?

That's true, I'll keep turbine housing only.

I always run on a 100 octane gas pump fuel. There's no point using racing fuel or additives on a DD car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tcode here is GT3071/GT3076/GT3582 turbos with 0.63a/r turbine side in lancer evo 8 in same dyno and same setup. You see here that GT3076 is not that much better than GT3071 because it has same turbine side which is now bottle neck. Also much slower spool. When you see GT3582 which has bigger turbine side it flow much better and torque does not spike that badly.

http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o143/VulvaS40T4/garrettturbocompare.jpg

http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o143/VulvaS40T4/garretttu rbocompare.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets hope your right. If you had measured that manifolt pressure we would know more in how maxed up that 0.63a/r turbine is.

Still in that picture you see that gt3071 vs gt3076 produces only 27hp more and spools 500rpm later and difference in those setups is only that bigger compressor wheel. Then much bigger gt3582 makes 58hp more than gt3071 and spools same as gt3076 and in gt3582 there is bigger compressor and turbine wheel, same turbine a/r in all.

Shape of curves also points out that in evo gt3071 is fully maxed out and also gt3076 seems to be spiky in torque and gt3582 could have made more. Those red and blue lines are in different boost so you can see when turbo starts to be not so efficient any more.

I think that you maxed out that gt3071 in your car and that turbo was in good balance betwheen compressor and turbine side. Now i would have chosen also bigger turbine a/r if you choose gt3076, because turbine wheel size is same in both. Buy 0.82a/r housing so you can really push that bigger compressor. Razz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...