Jump to content
Volvospeed Forums

Fmic Teaser Pics


Zulu

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest DougK

It seems that it would.  Lower down thus colder air and it has far more access to the air because it isn't squeezed in there behind radiator.  Colder air all around.  However, the air might be heated more than usual, considering how freaking hot it looks FMIC style. :D

And yes, aluminum pipes all the way.

'cept the amount of surface area on a OEM sized intercooler (not saying OEM or in teh OEM position though) makes that a MUCH better idea.

Atleast do yourself a favor, get an air intake temp sensor and do some before and afters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dont be arseholes im just trying to learn!!!!! im sorry for being a nub! someone offer me a nice explanation without any insults!

:D and FMIC is a front mount intercooler, which takes place of the stock intercooler (something NA cars don't have) . The point is to take pressurized hot air, run it through the intercooler and cool it down, then introduce it to gas and BOOM.. colder more dense air, means more power.

In theory, an FMIC is going to allow the air to be cooled more, since it's in the direct path of the ambient air passing over it, as you drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you...now can you explain to me why non-turbo cars dont have the ability to possess an intercooler? is it because it deals directly with the turbo itself?

Yup.. your car takes air from outside, and introduces it to fuel.. hence the "NA"

There's no need for an intercooler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theoretically speaking, if the air was colder wouldnt that make a difference because it would be more compact and it could produce more power? or is this just a silly inconcievable dream?

What limits one from putting a turbo in a non turbo car?

i know these are simple, easy questions but im a beginning enthusiast so just bear with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theoretically speaking, if the air was colder wouldnt that make a difference because it would be more compact and it could produce more power? or is this just a silly inconcievable dream?

hence the sale of CIA's to the billions of honda guys.

What limits one from putting a turbo in a non turbo car?

i know these are simple, easy questions but im a beginning enthusiast so just bear with me.

the hassle, money, cost, headache.. it's easier to just get a turbocharged car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The air compressed by the turbo heats it up more than you would ever normally see in a naturally aspirated engine, so no you really wouldn't see any gain for an n/a car.

See, simply put, a byproduct of compressing the air is friction, which results in heat. It's been a while since I was in my college physics classes, but that's one of the reasons for the added heat that you're not going to see in an n/a environment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could somebody provide me with the efficiency graph of the Atech or these OEM replacement cores?

And I don't see how mounting it in OEM position is more efficient than FMIC as OEM is closer to engine among other components that would heat the area. But yeah, since most high performance cars mount their ICs behind condensor..

"What I think we can say conclusively is that the Volvo intercooler poses a restriction as the power level rises, and that a higher flowing or more efficient intercooler would be desirable. Preferably one that is front mounted. Even the Volvo intercooler would do better front mounted, but you might have to relocate the AC condenser."

-A guy from TurboBricks quoting an article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...