the underlørd Posted August 7, 2005 Report Share Posted August 7, 2005 John made 223whp and around 210-215 w trq with: Stock chip, 3" turboback, Atech and a 5spd.His numbers were very good...mine dyno'd around 185whp @ 10psi running VERY VERY VERY rich (10:1 AFR). Noah's made about 195-200ish If I recall Correctly running 14psi, iPd chip and 2.5" catback. Im working on getting the numbers up right now←nice work Theresa..err I Mean Doug.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maiku Posted August 7, 2005 Report Share Posted August 7, 2005 kevin?online?on weekends? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bay13 Posted August 7, 2005 Report Share Posted August 7, 2005 just nned to know how to get into the ecu to change the fuel and the boost curvesWell it's good that you have Zero charge for your dyno runs, not so with the rest of us members, though.As far as the quote goes, you need to know, I need to know, everyone wants to know. Maybe some day it will make it out of the land of secrets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bay13 Posted August 7, 2005 Report Share Posted August 7, 2005 kevin?online?Thats not him, he gave his log on and password to someone so they could keep him involved over the weekend. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the underlørd Posted August 7, 2005 Report Share Posted August 7, 2005 Thats not him, he gave his log on and password to someone so they could keep him involved over the weekend. ←haha, funny funny... just workin on the cars at the shop.. takin a break.. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDELUNA Posted August 7, 2005 Report Share Posted August 7, 2005 approx. 20% drivetrain loss for the automatic so that being said: 221whp/.80 = 276 crank hp. 249wtq/.80 = 311 crank tq = approx. 421 Nm, so this being said it looks like you are a little ahead of the claimed numbers of Speedtuning. I hope this helps. God Bless. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelostartof Posted August 8, 2005 Report Share Posted August 8, 2005 True, but some where along the line stop changing the physicial set up of the car and start the long drawn out tuning of the ECU process. ←yup tho re tuning it after every mod can be expensive ... best bet ... save up .. do most of the mods @ once and tune it after that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nebor Posted August 8, 2005 Report Share Posted August 8, 2005 Nice to see how I stacked up against everyone else. Turbos be damned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poi Posted August 8, 2005 Report Share Posted August 8, 2005 Nice to see how I stacked up against everyone else. Turbos be damned.←was that your 960!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nebor Posted August 8, 2005 Report Share Posted August 8, 2005 was that your 960!?←Yup. Pre-pole, of course. It didn't do so well once the driveshaft just sort of layed there on the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poi Posted August 8, 2005 Report Share Posted August 8, 2005 Yup. Pre-pole, of course. It didn't do so well once the driveshaft just sort of layed there on the ground.←how the hell did it put down practically its rated HP to the ground? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackT5 Posted August 8, 2005 Report Share Posted August 8, 2005 Are you going to be able to post the dyno graph? I wanna see it and the the a/f readout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nebor Posted August 8, 2005 Report Share Posted August 8, 2005 how the hell did it put down practically its rated HP to the ground?←*shrug*I ran two different days. Both were within 10hp of one another.Uh, k&n panel filter? Also had exhaust work done.I always felt that my 960 would have kept up with the s70 T5 I have now. It doesn't have to crazy pull over 4000rpm (quite the opposite, the late 960s just seemed to die after 5200 rpm) but it takes off way, way faster and is much more responsive than the S70. And it was RWD.And the dash didn't creak and rattle.And the CD player wasn't a piece of junk.*sigh* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poi Posted August 8, 2005 Report Share Posted August 8, 2005 *shrug*I ran two different days. Both were within 10hp of one another.Uh, k&n panel filter? Also had exhaust work done.I always felt that my 960 would have kept up with the s70 T5 I have now. It doesn't have to crazy pull over 4000rpm (quite the opposite, the late 960s just seemed to die after 5200 rpm) but it takes off way, way faster and is much more responsive than the S70. And it was RWD.And the dash didn't creak and rattle.And the CD player wasn't a piece of junk.*sigh*←hmm. wonder how much power im actually making then....and they are indeed nice. sell the s70 :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nebor Posted August 8, 2005 Report Share Posted August 8, 2005 hmm. wonder how much power im actually making then....and they are indeed nice. sell the s70 ←I really thought about buying another 960\s90 when I was shopping around for another "fun car." But at the time it was just too heart wrenching to think of getting another one.My dreams of a turbocharged 960.... shattered. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.