Jump to content
Volvospeed Forums

0-100 Mph In 10.5 Secs


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

You run 1.3 bar with just a chip?  No mbc or aquamist?

jep just a custom bsr. i used to run 1.3 bar, but it only did that in fifth gear. 1.25 in fourth. now i run a quite steady 1.2 in fourth and fifth form 4000 to 5000. at top speed with 6 rpm and more in fifth it still does 1.05 bar.

dont actually know why i dont hit the 1.3 anymore, or at least very rarely.

is my wastegate or turbo itself starting to break?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok, it was hard to really figure out when you started going, but it looks like you dropped the clutch around 3500 and started to go (which started 1.21 seconds into the video) so thats where I started my calculations . . . .

IN MPH

0-60 = 4.9

0-100 = 10.9

0-125 = 17.9

0-130 = 20.0

so I have to say, very very nice performance ! ! ! ! !

if you want to compare this to other cars tested by Road and Track, here are cars that have the same acceleration pretty much

BMW M3 SMG

Corvette 50th Ann. Edition

Jaguar XJR

Maybach 57

SLK 32 AMG

GREAT JOB VOLFO

p.s. - I can't do Johanns 0-60 and 0-100 because his is in Quicktime format, if someone can change that to another program, I can compare it to Volfo . . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i am in good company then. thanks for figuring the out the other cars... :)

and we can all be proud of getting those figures with a FRONT (!) Wheel drive car AND a standing start. :D

i have learnt so much thru vptuning and this forum. for example the underdrive pulley which caused just :huh: at MR sweden. they didnt even know stiff like that was existing.....

wich size of the autotech intercooler would u suggest? 40, 50 or 60mm? assumed that i keep pushing 1.3 bar?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

good video, i don't like how the first part is all blurry and crap though . . . . but good video nonetheless

well i took the time again and again but from 0 to 160 (o to 100 mph) i get below 11 secs all the time. and to 200k (125 miles) i get belo 18. i dont understand how u get 20 here :huh:

the point where i take off can be heard with my tires squeeling and.....

be seen when the water for the windshield switches on :)

but anyway i need a g-tech or an official time or something........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well i took the time again and again but from 0 to 160 (o to 100 mph) i get below 11 secs all the time. and to 200k (125 miles) i get belo 18. i dont understand how u get 20 here :huh:

the point where i take off can be heard with my tires squeeling and.....

be seen when the water for the windshield switches on :)

but anyway i need a g-tech or an official time or something........

yeah, the calculations aren't 100 % accurate, but they are closer then just using a stopwatch . . . . maybe they are .2 seconds off . . . .

HAHA I MESSED UP, see i took 200 X .6, not .62 like it should be, they have been fixed . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

our 0-60 time is accurate, but the video starts to accelerate about 1.29 seconds into the movie, he hits 100 mph about 12.3 /12.4 seconds, so a 0-100 in 10.9 seconds is right . . . . . I miscalculated the 100 because I thought it was 165 km/hr . . . . sorry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forget side by side videos - you and Johann have to race. :)

You both hit 124mph (200kmph) in about the same time I think.

Is there a list anywhere of exactly what you did to reduce the weight?

figuring out Johanns movie times now. . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...