azinwa Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 1996 854-RB-5234T-516-TS 60 R Exhaust manifold3" Down pipe2.5 IPD cat back2.5 alloy rip kitEST air filter kitMSD ign coilIPD remapMBC set to 17 psiVolvospeed decalsCertanly someone out there should know exactly what this combination will net me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pennybridge pioneer Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 14.1 @ 99mphedit// lol, i just spotted vs decals on that list, well in that case, maybe 100mph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maiku Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 mods don't matterdriver skillz matter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHEIII874T5M Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 Net? Power wise or track time? I'd say 260whp trapping about 101 mph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliot Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 I would say 270-275 fly power unless you go to a dynojet then it will read 275 WHP lol and a trap 0f 99-100mph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHEIII874T5M Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 I would say 270-275 fly power unless you go to a dynojet then it will read 275 WHP lol and a trap 0f 99-100mphPower I could see where you're coming from, but the trap speed... c'mon man, are you telling me a car with those modifications will not get 100 MPH in the 1/4 mile?? I'd sure as heck hope it would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
javadoc Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 312whp, if you use the dyno that Carson used. 15.1 second quarter.<runs> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JHEIII874T5M Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 312whp, if you use the dyno that Carson used. 15.1 second quarter.<runs> :ph34r: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilBrick Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 Our cars will NEVER make great drag cars...... Face it tooo heavy. Auto-X is another story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fastboy Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USMC850T Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 Net? Power wise or track time? I'd say 260whp trapping about 101 mph.My ST chip, exhaust and intake got me a 14.2 @ 97 - I would hope his list of mods would be a little bit better of a jump than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
javadoc Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 12In canadian hp, yes. I think you forgot the vs decals though. Definitely 13.4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Che'_Moderator Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 IMHO:S 60 R Exhaust manifold 3hp3" Down pipe 6hp2.5 IPD cat back 5hp2.5 alloy rip kit 1hpEST air filter kit 5hpMSD ign coil 2hpIPD remap 23hpMBC set to 17 psi Just more under the graphVolvospeed decals 10000 million hp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
POOKDIZZLE Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 All depends on the launch, the first 60 is where it counts with the FWD ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Che'_Moderator Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 Our cars will NEVER make great drag cars...... Face it tooo heavy. Auto-X is another storyLet me get this straight. You think our cars are better built for auto-x than drag? I cannot think of many cars that would do worse in auto-x. I bet a can push a jeep through the cones faster than you can run a Volvo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.