FINN Posted July 26, 2012 Report Share Posted July 26, 2012 Good luck with the build. Do you have a goal on when you want to drop it back in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martijn_B Posted July 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2012 Thanks Finn, it'l be around end of august. So I have made some use of my Innovate products yesterday and went out for a spin. Didn't want to lose my license so I did a run in 2nd, 3rd and a bit 4th gear: *The mapping is made for my 19T, I am running a K24 atm *Weather was 25 celcius // 77 fahrenheit *Running the stock FMIC 2nd gear under full load averages: 12,38 // 0,842 3rd gear under full load averages: 12,31 // 0,837 4th gear under full load averages: 12,29 // 0,836 I believe this is relatively safe, what do you think? I question the performance though, because it is absolutely not fast...a 100-200 kph run (60 to 120 mph) takes a little over 16 seconds... I do run N/A cams (both intake and exhaust) on the by IPD recommended setting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NitroX5 Posted July 26, 2012 Report Share Posted July 26, 2012 Is that really ~2.2Bar?? That's insane And way out of efficient range...IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
850wagonT5 Posted July 26, 2012 Report Share Posted July 26, 2012 I'd probably target closer to 11.5-12, but that doesn't seem dangerous to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volvo5.0 Posted July 26, 2012 Report Share Posted July 26, 2012 Is that really ~2.2Bar?? That's insane And way out of efficient range...IMO. I see on his log that the Gizzmo EBC is set for 1.4 bar. That's where I have mine set also, about 20psi. That log showing 2.3 bar might be the absolute pressure (atmospheric + boost pressure). That would seem to make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NitroX5 Posted July 26, 2012 Report Share Posted July 26, 2012 I see on his log that the Gizzmo EBC is set for 1.4 bar. That's where I have mine set also, about 20psi. That log showing 2.3 bar might be the absolute pressure (atmospheric + boost pressure). That would seem to make sense. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martijn_B Posted July 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2012 Yep it includes atmospheric as well. Any other comments on the AFR? Wondering why my 60-120 time is this slow when AFR and boost level seem to be correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volvo5.0 Posted July 27, 2012 Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 Do you have a way to log timing? Maybe some issues with timing pull that is affecting your 60-120 times. Should be a few seconds faster with the K24. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookforjoe Posted July 27, 2012 Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 Those logs seem awfully brief to be meaningful - I usually edit logs down to 100rpm increments, covering greater time spans. Not sure how you can garner meaningful analysis from a log that only covers a four hundred rpm span (your 4th log). It seems a little lean around 5K, especially for WOT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
850wagonT5 Posted July 27, 2012 Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 What hardware/software are you using for your logging, anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martijn_B Posted July 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 Thanks for the feedback guys, I will upload a log with a more detailed rpm span later today. I cannot log timing unfortunately. That plus EGT is still on my wish list but won't be anytime soon. I'm using the LC1 and LMA3 from Innovate to log this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volvo5.0 Posted July 27, 2012 Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 Thanks for the feedback guys, I will upload a log with a more detailed rpm span later today. I cannot log timing unfortunately. That plus EGT is still on my wish list but won't be anytime soon. I'm using the LC1 and LMA3 from Innovate to log this. I was using 1 channel of the LMA3 for the accelerometer also, but decided to shuffle things around to free up a spot for the EGT. The probe isn't that expensive and for me it was more usable data than the accelerometer. I'd be curious to compare EGT's since you're also running the K24. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martijn_B Posted July 27, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 Ill be buying the probe soon indeed, thought it over and decided it's worth the couple of bucks to invest in. As Hussein said my RPM ranges were not detailed enough, i made some new screenshots. This is a WOT run in 2nd and 3rd gear from about 3000 to 6700 RPM: I used conditional formatting in Excel to have an easier look at the AFR cells. It seems that around the 5100~5400 rpm range it runs leaner, more towards 12,7 instead of 12,4-ish. I take this is better to look at? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookforjoe Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Yes.... but you want to edit it out to 100 rpm increments - maybe 50rpm in areas of concern. I would say it's a little lean at 5K - but the important log for that would be 4th gear where the load is greater & typically AFR's get richer (for any given load area) as you go up through the gears. Without logged timing, it's hard to determine whether you are optimal in terms of your AFR's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martijn_B Posted August 2, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 2, 2012 Hm.. I should figure out a way to log timing then as i do not have OBD II. Today ive picked up the engine at the machine shop. The cylinderwalls have been honed and I purchased new piston rings with them. They also put the engine in some kind of bath that cleans it, so looks real tidy now and most aged oil spots are removed. Unfortunately they have not put a number on the crankshaft bearings but just removed the upper ones and put them in a plastig bag. As they seem to differ in thickness, I was wondering if I still can get the bearings right? Couple of pictures: Oil sludge in the crankcase ventilation port: Then started with continuing taking the rods and pistons apart. The pistons look good so I will be using them again. Rods are being replaced by CX Racing rods. Then tried to remove the dirt thats in the pistonring gaps. After im done they will enjoy a bath @ the revision shop. Thats it for now, is there anyone that can tell me more about the crankshaft bearings? Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.