flyfishing3 Posted January 10, 2013 Author Report Posted January 10, 2013 i'm fine with people that are pro life, but thats an extreme view and i can not find any common ground on something like that. and again, who is he or any politician to pass their view on to me.
Burn-E Posted January 10, 2013 Report Posted January 10, 2013 Leaders lead Mike. At least that's the way it's supposed to be. Not leaders send out polls every 30 minutes to determine where the mind of the masses is and follow their lead. Bill Clinton forever changed the nature of Executive politics with his heavy reliance on poll data. Whether or not you agree with him, he's taking a stand. And I agree that's not a winning issue he's staking his reputation on.
flyfishing3 Posted January 10, 2013 Author Report Posted January 10, 2013 I BELIEVE, there are things that require leadership much more than this settled, and ruled on many times topic.
Burn-E Posted January 10, 2013 Report Posted January 10, 2013 I BELIEVE, there are things that require leadership much more than this settled, and ruled on many times topic. That's just because you're a godless misguided man who believes shooting 20 six year old kids is a massive crime against humanity while murdering 1 million + unborn children every year is totally acceptable public policy.
flyfishing3 Posted January 11, 2013 Author Report Posted January 11, 2013 these guys: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/georgia-republican-rep-phil-gingrey-favors-gun-control-162924309--politics.html he's all over the road.
Burn-E Posted January 11, 2013 Report Posted January 11, 2013 It's a fireside chat examining the scientific and philosophical sides of rape. I don't know why any politician feels the need to touch that live wire.
flyfishing3 Posted January 11, 2013 Author Report Posted January 11, 2013 well personally, i feel we have the right to know where an any elected politician falls on any of these topics. if you have the ability to influence any law, we have the right to know how they will vote.
Burn-E Posted January 11, 2013 Report Posted January 11, 2013 Agreed. But that's why the good ones are hard to pin down on certain issues.
Burn-E Posted January 15, 2013 Report Posted January 15, 2013 Ach Zoning Boards and FEMA. What a nightmare. "the power which a multiple millionaire, who may be my neighbor and perhaps my employer, has over me is very much less than that which the smallest functionnaire possesses who wields the coercive power of the state on whose discretion it depends whether and how I am to be allowed to live or to work."
flyfishing3 Posted January 15, 2013 Author Report Posted January 15, 2013 That's a shame, not sure the answer because we need reg's. Reg's need enforced Enforcing bones the already boned The problem I have us, live by the water, you get wet. Do t want to get wet, don't live by the water Why is our govt having to provide flood Ins? No Ins co wants to touch these property's. get the message. Were not meant to live seaside
flyfishing3 Posted January 16, 2013 Author Report Posted January 16, 2013 where's the check and balance's. i guess bush's buddies could do whatever they wanted http://news.yahoo.com/interior-secretarys-220-000-bathroom-143722045--abc-news-politics.html
flyfishing3 Posted January 26, 2013 Author Report Posted January 26, 2013 put this here to keep this clean. and i'm ok with this: http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2013/01/26/vending-machine-at-pa-college-offers-morning-after-pill/
Fudge_Brownie Posted January 26, 2013 Report Posted January 26, 2013 put this here to keep this clean. and i'm ok with this: http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2013/01/26/vending-machine-at-pa-college-offers-morning-after-pill/"That raised questions about how accessible emergency contraception should be."Why the hell would ANYONE want to restrict contraceptives? Except the few people who believe no contraception should ever be used, which I think is safely in the minority.
Recommended Posts