Gregg Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 how about just no pictures in sigs? We have avatars and if people want to show off their cars, there is the showroom, the owner's gallery, and lots of other pages for image hosting that people can link to.Sure, it's nice to be able to a funny picture into a sig, but it's not really needed. Maybe people would use the showroom and gallery on here more regularly if pictures weren't allowed in the signatures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theunderlord Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 how about just no pictures in sigs? We have avatars and if people want to show off their cars, there is the showroom, the owner's gallery, and lots of other pages for image hosting that people can link to.Sure, it's nice to be able to a funny picture into a sig, but it's not really needed. Maybe people would use the showroom and gallery on here more regularly if pictures weren't allowed in the signatures?←I say leave it up to user discression.. nothing too huge... we'll be fine.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beachnut Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 Here ... sweet and simple, no avatar, no sig pic, no mods list, just a link to the gallery. stuff, I'd have to go through all my receipts for the last year to figure out my mod list Actually I have them all in a Word doc just waiting for me to get off my jerk and create that little webpage I keep putting off.Btw, I'm with 850Ridah ... the constant quote replying is WAY annoying more than the pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mesoam Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 my sig is really the best of both worlds....you guys know it! haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Franke Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 Hey, I spent two whole lectures trying to get the spacing and sutff right on mine... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PyROTech Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 what res do you guys use? i either use 2048x1536 or 1920x1440 "this one mostly". Its depends on my mood and how tired i am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Franke Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 1440x900 (widescreen, baby!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kibim Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 I think big pictures shouldn't be allowed. Kev's size is like top limit. I'm running 3200x1200 on a dual 21", and i still only get 3 posts on a screen. Other forums i'm on have limited (software enforced) sig pic size of the dimentions of my logo. It's something like 200x90. Also thing of the poor 56k viewers, and us unfortuante international blokes. (who are reduced to 56k on occasion.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDiva Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 I like pics in sigs, it gives the page colour so you don't just have pages of bland looking text, but I think maybe limiting the sizes couln't hurt.& yes, 10 quotes in a reply is annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dancetheman Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 lets hope members have common sense not to post a wallpaper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdizzle Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 I say leave it up to user discression.. nothing too huge... we'll be fine..←Agreed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Tuning 850 Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 You have to specify what is too huge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick. Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 Is mine too large? I'll size her down if I have to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 johann, i think the bigger ban should be "DUDE, SEARCH!" how many of those do we see every day :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theunderlord Posted February 17, 2005 Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 johann, i think the bigger ban should be "DUDE, SEARCH!" how many of those do we see every day ←look "guest" you're about the "dude search" cause you can't search, cause you refuse to register. so you have no say. m'kay. you've racked up 122 posts and you're not even a member? what gives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.