Serdar-S60T5 Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 hi guys.. i went to the dyno yesterday. i will post the graph in a few hours as soon as i have it scanned. i have a 3" downpipe and a custom superchip @ 17.5 psi and was expecting close to 240 whp. the results were 222 fwhp (275 at the crank) and 225 fwtq (280 lb.ft at the crank) ... now this wasn't a "load dyno" but it was probably the most reliable among the ones in istanbul. Therefore i was a little disappointedhowever, a guy with a brand new renault megane sport (2.0 turbo) was there just before me and his car pushed only 208 hp at the crank although it is supposed to be 225 bhp crank from the factory. he was there to test it before chipping it, and his car was only at 4k miles yet. so i'm hoping these results were quite conservative... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCviggen Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Probably, how was the cooling? A good fan makes a huge difference for the results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serdar-S60T5 Posted September 28, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 hi... actually they had a rather small fan. it didn't feel very strong. and to be honest, the car was also not in its best condition. the service time for the air filter, spark plugs and the engine oil are really close. i checked the engine oil level before the test, and to my surprise, it was down to almost minimum level. but i went on with the test anyway... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volvoboi24 Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Not a bad start, 222 whp is what i dyno'd in after I got my 17PSI chip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serdar-S60T5 Posted September 28, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Not a bad start, 222 whp is what i dyno'd in after I got my 17PSI chipthanks man :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yerrow Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 hi... actually they had a rather small fan. it didn't feel very strong. and to be honest, the car was also not in its best condition. the service time for the air filter, spark plugs and the engine oil are really close. i checked the engine oil level before the test, and to my surprise, it was down to almost minimum level. but i went on with the test anyway...so you're willing to risk your engine seizing just to see what it put outs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serdar-S60T5 Posted September 28, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 so you're willing to risk your engine seizing just to see what it put outs...well it wasn't below the minimum line and i also had 1 bottle of motor silk in the engine which i was pretty sure would protect my engine, that's why i went on... maybe it wasn't such a good idea after all.but i did go and buy a liter of 0-40W and added it on today... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricF Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 so you're willing to risk your engine seizing just to see what it put outs...Many Swedish 850s that are running faster only fill to the minimum line to reduce crankcase pressure. It is safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellas850 T-5 Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Very nice neighbor!!!Do you have any plans for the future? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serdar-S60T5 Posted September 28, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Very nice neighbor!!!Do you have any plans for the future?thanks man well i might want to upgrade to 19T like you, or at least maybe modify this 16T, like porting and polishing it and get a new chip and call it a day... as this car is a geartronic, i don't want to push the tranny too hard, in case it might break on me or something... but then will come sway bars and 17" wheels... apart from that i'm thinking of some minor cosmetic work... but i'll have to wait for my year end bonus for all those i guess. <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbor850 Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 nice job on getting a dyno donehave the graph ? ? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellas850 T-5 Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Can you post for me your torque in NM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurboSam Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Well no reason to be disappointed ! Mine had 278.7 hp EWG what are 285 hp Din 70020. Most guys i know here in Switz run 18-19 psi to reach 290 and more hp. Numbers are numbers but how the car performs on the street is somthing different. I use my car everyday, 35 000 - 40 000 km a year. It's no problem to tune up a car to much hp but reliability is much more important to me. when i had 240 hp i was bored after one week, when i had 275 hp i was bored after a week. Now i have 285 and i'm still bored Sit back, relax and enjoy your car ! intercooler and bigger turbo are the easiest way to get more power... but for my car it's too late. Sad but trueSamEdit: Torque is a bit low with 280 ft.lbs. = 380 NM. Mine has 295 ft.lbs. which are also not really very special . But with the automatic transmission you can't tune it to much more. The best i saw here where 420 NM or so for an auto. Manuals should be 420 up to 480... with Chip, 16T, down pipe and exhaust ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbor850 Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Edit: Torque is a bit low with 280 ft.lbs. = 380 NM. Mine has 295 ft.lbs. which are also not really very special . But with the automatic transmission you can't tune it to much more. The best i saw here where 420 NM or so for an auto. Manuals should be 420 up to 480... with Chip, 16T, down pipe and exhaust !is 350 WTQ = 475 NM to the wheels ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurboSam Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 is 350 WTQ = 475 NM to the wheels ?Thats correct. Wish to have that at the crank Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.