Hellas850 T-5 Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 I saw to my first time at the dyno,I saw 235hp and 348nm.After a chip from SCT AB tuning(SAM knows the story),I saw 268hp and 448nm.I had an argument with them(SCT) and they send me another chip.I haven't been to the dyno yet,but the car is much stronger despite of the problems.Is that the small turbo and the 2300cc engine responsible for too much torque?I believe it is too much,for a car with chip free silencer and filter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurboSam Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Well 450 NM are nice for the mods you have ! Hp is not that important because it's only a "product" of torque and rpm. The longer you have much torque, the higher your hp numbers. If you have torque from low rpm to high rpm you have a fast car For a manual no problem in my opinion. Get a race clutch and enjoy the power.Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellas850 T-5 Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 I have seen other cars,most of them have about 300hp and less torque than 450nm.As I remember from the first dyno the power line goes to the top at about 4500rpm and stays until 6000rpm,very confusing concerning the improvements.I believe that the 15G limits the power,although the numbers are quite good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurboSam Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Sure a 19T would perform better up top than a 15G but it has also a bigger lag. That's the major reason why i still have my 16T. I have about 270 ft.lbs. from 2000 rpm to 6000 with 295 peak at about 4100. Here in the mountains early torque is important. Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellas850 T-5 Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 I have a friend he is one of the best mechanics here in Athens.We are talking to find and match a turbo-TURBONETICS.I had in mind something from Garrett,but I want something more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c70pete Posted September 29, 2006 Report Share Posted September 29, 2006 I have a friend he is one of the best mechanics here in Athens.We are talking to find and match a turbo-TURBONETICS.I had in mind something from Garrett,but I want something more.Hey KIM.... nice #'s... how fast can you do 80-180 km/h run?why don't you just get an 18T turbo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serdar-S60T5 Posted September 29, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2006 hello guys... thanks for your supportive comments well i have the graph scanned but unfortunately my company's firewall won't let me access any of the sites on which i can host the darn thing... so it's here on my computer but i can't post the pic without hosting it somewhere. i guess i'll have to do this from home this weekend... unfortunately we have this stupid firewall to stop employees from uploading confidential company info to wrong places. :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellas850 T-5 Posted September 29, 2006 Report Share Posted September 29, 2006 Hey KIM.... nice #'s... how fast can you do 80-180 km/h run?why don't you just get an 18T turbo?with wich gear? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellas850 T-5 Posted September 29, 2006 Report Share Posted September 29, 2006 hello guys... thanks for your supportive comments well i have the graph scanned but unfortunately my company's firewall won't let me access any of the sites on which i can host the darn thing... so it's here on my computer but i can't post the pic without hosting it somewhere. i guess i'll have to do this from home this weekend... unfortunately we have this stupid firewall to stop employees from uploading confidential company info to wrong places. Well,we'll have to wait then to see the nice results :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serdar-S60T5 Posted September 29, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2006 Well,we'll have to wait then to see the nice results i could hardly say they're nice but thanks my friend... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c70pete Posted September 29, 2006 Report Share Posted September 29, 2006 with wich gear?well.. I was thinking the gears that would get your car from 80-180 the quickest... so would that mean starting the roll on in 2nd gear or 3rd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c70pete Posted September 29, 2006 Report Share Posted September 29, 2006 with wich gear?well.. I was thinking the gears that would get your car from 80-180 the quickest... so would that mean starting the roll on in 2nd gear or 3rd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellas850 T-5 Posted October 7, 2006 Report Share Posted October 7, 2006 well.. I was thinking the gears that would get your car from 80-180 the quickest... so would that mean starting the roll on in 2nd gear or 3rd?I made a test for you,about 4 sec for both gears.the difference was very small concerning the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c70pete Posted October 7, 2006 Report Share Posted October 7, 2006 I made a test for you,about 4 sec for both gears.the difference was very small concerning the time.Kim,you mean 14 seconds right? you say 4 (four) seconds above??!!!P. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellas850 T-5 Posted October 7, 2006 Report Share Posted October 7, 2006 Kim,you mean 14 seconds right? you say 4 (four) seconds above??!!!P.I'm sorry I had the thought that you were saying 80-120. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.