Jump to content
Volvospeed Forums

Bike Pics!


scoober

Recommended Posts

Local drama. Lady went off on the FB page of the local cycling club, I guess there are some very strong opinions within that club about the way she is handling things.

Anyway, after 3 careless driving tickets, she is in the slammer for continuing to ride her bike on a very busy 4 lane road. It's arguably the busiest road feeding Lexington, it has 3 hospitals, 1 mall and the university of Kentucky on it.

http://www.wkyt.com/home/headlines/Jessamine-County-cyclist-arrested-275411291.html

Sad thing is: there are 3-4 other ways to get to her destination, all beautiful roads with little to no traffic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't been able to decipher if it's anybody I know, but I don't recognize the frame.

I ride by here almost every time I ride. It's the bottom of a long decent and avg 27/28 mph through here

http://m.wtae.com/news/crash-on-sardis-road-murrysville/28088952

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really doesn't take much to be a responsible cyclist...This woman is an idiot if she thinks riding in the middle of a lane with traffic moving faster than her is in any way helping cyclists...

Yep.

I used to go off on the "Cycling advocates" and critical mass dickheads.

All they do is piss motorists off and they made my job harder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting situation. Do you have the basic rundown on what she is doing, or has done? Sounds like the issue is that she's riding in the right lane as if she's a car, and the court feels she is required to hug the edge of the road?

She commutes using one of the busiest roads and hogs the center portion of a lane. Can be either the right or left lane apparently. Honk and she'll flip you off, regardless of whether the honking is to warn her or tell her to get off the road. Shoulders are too rough and dirty for a bike, she'd flat in minutes. There are alternative routes that she refuses to use. She dug her heels and fought the system and it cam down on her hard. Now the entire local community of cyclists is paying the price.

Yep.

I used to go off on the "Cycling advocates" and critical mass dickheads.

All they do is piss motorists off and they made my job harder.

Bingo. That's the stance of all local cyclists who ride competitively and need the road year round. There's no need to be a douche and right 2 abreast, there's no need to flip off cars or yell at them if they ignore the 3 ft rule. Just ride and let them drive, they'll have forgotten about you by their next turn.

People are talking about doing a critical mass ride here, I guarantee it: it would lead to casualties. KY is still very backwards and redneck in many areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for using side-routes. But I'm kinda surprised you don't think she has the right to do what she's doing? She has an obligation to keep to the right, as much as safely possible. But if the edge of the road is unsafe?

She should use the side routes. But should she be required to? It's frustrating as hell what she's doing, and I'd be really pissed off every time I saw her do it, but I think the state should look at fixing the road's edge before they worry about punishing her. Granted, I only know as much as you've described. I'm probably missing something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for using side-routes. But I'm kinda surprised you don't think she has the right to do what she's doing? She has an obligation to keep to the right, as much as safely possible. But if the edge of the road is unsafe?

She should use the side routes. But should she be required to? It's frustrating as hell what she's doing, and I'd be really pissed off every time I saw her do it, but I think the state should look at fixing the road's edge before they worry about punishing her. Granted, I only know as much as you've described. I'm probably missing something.

That's the whole debate. Rights vs. common sense. I think if you're backing traffic up for a few miles twice a day, it should dawn on you that this road is just too busy for a cyclist to take up an entire lane.

She could have called the county road maintenance department and had the shoulder swept (suggested by a local official), she could numerous side route that are both scenic and safe, she could scoot to the right and let traffic get by her instead of dictating a 10-12 mph speed limit for 1/2 the road, etc... The list goes on.

Don't get me wrong, I still think the state went too far in prosecuting her. To add insult to injury, the prosecutor is on FB posting comments about how this was a super easy case to prosecute, etc.... But she could do a small gesture to work with cars and LEO's too. It would go a long way towards smoothing things over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No she does not have a right to obstruct traffic like that, if there's too much shit in the road she should complain to the town to get the street sweeper out or switch to a different tire to confidently navigate road debris.

It's not entirely her fault. During her trial, it came up that the Transportation Cabinet for the state had very confusing and misleading material. Add to that a recent campaign that had signs stating: "every lane is a bike lane" and you have people like her who will take it all literally instead of using common sense and courtesy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No she does not have a right to obstruct traffic like that, if there's too much shit in the road she should complain to the town to get the street sweeper out or switch to a different tire to confidently navigate road debris.

I go through a stop light on my motorcycle every night on the way home from work. It does not detect me, and I travel at odd hours so there often isn't anyone around. I reported that the sensor needs adjustment in May. They told me they'd "add it to the list". I've been running that red light all summer (treating it like a stop sign). Do we know that she didn't report it? And even if she didn't, can we assume all towns will act reasonably quickly to accommodate?

She was convicted of careless driving, right? But what does that mean in Kentucky? What was the actual action the court felt qualified?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...