PyROTech Posted January 9, 2007 Report Posted January 9, 2007 happy now? somewhat happier. But i would have preferred for the mods to leave it alone or pm me on removing it instead of just deleting it.
gdizzle Posted January 9, 2007 Author Report Posted January 9, 2007 somewhat happier. But i would have preferred for the mods to leave it alone or pm me on removing it instead of just deleting it.That's the way it's always been done. Sorry, life sucks. I didn't remove it, don't know who did.
javadoc Posted January 9, 2007 Report Posted January 9, 2007 Apparently, size... does... matter.done and done'r.
drinking940’s Posted January 9, 2007 Report Posted January 9, 2007 Apparently, size... does... matter.done and done'r.damnm on the day i choose to be a dick towards rob (96850glt) this happens. godadmnit@!
850_olaf_nz Posted January 9, 2007 Report Posted January 9, 2007 Good call!It's difficult to discretely read a car forum at the office with HUGE GARISH sig pics to a)download and attract netadmin attention, b)attract passing coworkers attention (or worse, the boss), and c)give the idea that not only do I drive a volvo but I'm enthusiastic about it too!!!! regards'Olaf'
drinking940’s Posted January 9, 2007 Report Posted January 9, 2007 Good call!It's difficult to discretely read a car forum at the office with HUGE GARISH sig pics to a)download and attract netadmin attention, b)attract passing coworkers attention (or worse, the boss), and c)give the idea that not only do I drive a volvo but I'm enthusiastic about it too!!!! regards'Olaf'fixed
Patrickw Posted January 9, 2007 Report Posted January 9, 2007 its probably all my fault since my old sig took up almost the whole page with my 2 lines of text.. sorry if i stired the $hit :rolleyes:
PyROTech Posted January 9, 2007 Report Posted January 9, 2007 That's the way it's always been done. Sorry, life sucks. I didn't remove it, don't know who did.i guess i cant have everything.
Texas850Turbo Posted January 9, 2007 Report Posted January 9, 2007 I think there should be a limit to the text too- maybe the same height as the sig pic? So the whole signature can't be taller than 300 pixels
Gioseppe Posted January 9, 2007 Report Posted January 9, 2007 i think 150 pixels is not tall enough.how about this. since other people still use 150px of image, and another 50 billion lines of text, i'll just use my NORMAL 200px tall image and about one line of text.if not, suckit.
Gioseppe Posted January 9, 2007 Report Posted January 9, 2007 plus, width should not matter. if it's about streamlining the forum so people don't have to scroll through rediculously long sigs (like ryans) then the width argument is moot.
prasamin Posted January 9, 2007 Report Posted January 9, 2007 don't be a pansy greg, atleast allow partially nws stuff in the sigs! :P
dmelviØØ7 Posted January 9, 2007 Report Posted January 9, 2007 I'm liking Joes' and Pras' arguments, although my current sig violates no rules whatsoever.
Gioseppe Posted January 9, 2007 Report Posted January 9, 2007 I'm liking Joes' and Pras' arguments, although my current sig violates no rules whatsoever.and yet it's still taller then some with pictures!vote NO on 150px.
Recommended Posts