Obama Or Mccain

[s70turbo1998]

OMFG......when I said...I bet.....It was sarcasm....GET IT

Just a quick FYI, sarcasm on the internet doesn't really work unless you type it properly. And even then it is hard to tell.

So I stand by what I said.

I think McCain will have better luck dealing with world wide affairs. Experience is definitely needed there. However, I feel that whomever is elected cannot go into their Presidency with the mindset that we will tell other countries what to do. We are in debt to a lot of outside sources, and need to respect that.

[theForgottenone]

1. if you know anything about a military engagement not everything can be planned out correct?

2. but they do not have the illegal immigration we do and the same economic issues we have correct?

(waiting for response that dodges this question and brings up another point that hold no water)

1. What is the rule of engagement for Iraq? If it was for humanity causes, there are plenty of other area around the world can benefit but I dont' see U.S involved. No concrete WMD evident was found in Iraq nor any terrorist responsible for it was from Iraq. Osama Bin Laden still at large.

2. Sweden have allows more Iraq refugee in one town more than the whole United States. Surely, we don't benefits anything from cheap labor of those illegal immigrants either.

[7 VII 7]

1. What is the rule of engagement for Iraq? If it was for humanity causes, there are plenty of other area around the world can benefit but I dont' see U.S involved. No concrete WMD evident was found in Iraq nor any terrorist responsible for it was from Iraq. Obama Bin Laden still at large.

2. Sweden have allows more Iraq refugee in one town more than the whole United States. Surely, we don't benefits anything from cheap labor of those illegal immigrants either.

1. they came out and said they were giving the wrong info on the WMD... well anyways the went in there and took a lead out of power that had put terror all over the country Saddam... I would say thats a pretty big terrorist

2. prove it. and we do get cheap labor from them but they want to work dumb dumb. They make money from us and send it back to their families in Mexico or where ever they are from. You talk to any legal residate that got their green card and went through the correct channels to get into this country and they will tell you that they do not want illegals in here also.

[s70turbo1998]

1. What is the rule of engagement for Iraq? If it was for humanity causes, there are plenty of other area around the world can benefit but I dont' see U.S involved. No concrete WMD evident was found in Iraq nor any terrorist responsible for it was from Iraq. Obama Bin Laden still at large.

2. Sweden have allows more Iraq refugee in one town more than the whole United States. Surely, we don't benefits anything from cheap labor of those illegal immigrants either.

The united states has interests in Iraq. So we are focusing there. Iraq also posed a much more global threat then say Darfur. I am pretty damn sure we'd be in Darfur right now if they were developing nukes and setting oil fields ablaze.

[theForgottenone]

1. they came out and said they were giving the wrong info on the WMD... well anyways the went in there and took a lead out of power that had put terror all over the country Saddam... I would say thats a pretty big terrorist

2. prove it. and we do get cheap labor from them but they want to work dumb dumb. They make money from us and send it back to their families in Mexico or where ever they are from. You talk to any legal residate that got their green card and went through the correct channels to get into this country and they will tell you that they do not want illegals in here also.

1. One of the primary reason for Iraq was OIL. you can deny it all you want but WMD and humanity is just another blind the govt put out for the mass population and the rest of the world to believe it. What about the "Axis of Evil". Are we gonna engage war with N.Korea, Paskistan, India, & China now that they all have nuclear weapons capability?

2. http://volvospeed.com/vs_forum/index.php?showtopic=95780

[7 VII 7]

1. One of the primary reason for Iraq was OIL. you can deny it all you want but WMD and humanity is just another blind the govt put out for the mass population and the rest of the world to believe it. What about the "Axis of Evil". Are we gonna engage war with N.Korea, Paskistan, India, & China now that they all have nuclear weapons capability?

2. http://volvospeed.com/vs_forum/index.php?showtopic=95780

1. no becuase they have a better "government" and accountability than Iraq did

2. and what is your point so there are more there

3. lets get back on topic :D

[Austin H]

Just a quick FYI, sarcasm on the internet doesn't really work unless you type it properly. And even then it is hard to tell.

So I stand by what I said.

I think McCain will have better luck dealing with world wide affairs. Experience is definitely needed there. However, I feel that whomever is elected cannot go into their Presidency with the mindset that we will tell other countries what to do. We are in debt to a lot of outside sources, and need to respect that.

Did you know, that we would be in no debt if countries around the world paid us the money they owe us?

1. What is the rule of engagement for Iraq? If it was for humanity causes, there are plenty of other area around the world can benefit but I dont' see U.S involved. No concrete WMD evident was found in Iraq nor any terrorist responsible for it was from Iraq. Obama Bin Laden still at large.

2. Sweden have allows more Iraq refugee in one town more than the whole United States. Surely, we don't benefits anything from cheap labor of those illegal immigrants either.

Wait, is this the guy running for president or the guy living in a mountain? Or both? Maybe it's all the same guy.

[theForgottenone]

Wait, is this the guy running for president or the guy living in a mountain? Or both? Maybe it's all the same guy.

typo :P

[Austin H]

typo

I got ya, just trying to lighten things up around here :lol:

[Plan_B]

typo

Why do you even bother arguing with these people, if you don't have enough work to do I will gladly call Paul

Oh, and don't you owe me lunch?, or do I owe you?

[lookforjoe]

No more old white guys

+1

[Plan_B]

She better be the VP <_<

[gdizzle]

1. One of the primary reason for Iraq was OIL. you can deny it all you want but WMD and humanity is just another blind the govt put out for the mass population and the rest of the world to believe it. What about the "Axis of Evil". Are we gonna engage war with N.Korea, Paskistan, India, & China now that they all have nuclear weapons capability?

2. http://volvospeed.com/vs_forum/index.php?showtopic=95780

Yes, we went to war for oil, yet our gas prices are soaring. Good theory.

It amazes me how many peoples eyes Obama has pulled the wool over so to speak. The man promises change, will not define said change, and people eat it up. It's scary. Also, the man can lie like no other, and when he's asked a question, starts talking about soemthing totally unrelated then will address the actual question w/ no more than 10 words of BS and go back to talking about something totally unrelated again. Again, people eat it up, like he's some type of savior. I seriously think the movie idocracy is a prophecy of what's to come. We're all going to be eating burgers at butt fuckers and watering our plants with gatorade. :arob:

[7 VII 7]

Yes, we went to war for oil, yet our gas prices are soaring. Good theory.

It amazes me how many peoples eyes Obama has pulled the wool over so to speak. The man promises change, will not define said change, and people eat it up. It's scary. Also, the man can lie like no other, and when he's asked a question, starts talking about soemthing totally unrelated then will address the actual question w/ no more than 10 words of BS and go back to talking about something totally unrelated again. Again, people eat it up, like he's some type of savior. I seriously think the movie idocracy is a prophecy of what's to come. We're all going to be eating burgers at butt fuckers and watering our plants with gatorade.

Like I said the Democrats had SUCH an oppertunity to have a stong canidate this election to really make some change... but people are so caught up with Obama and how he says there will be change and people are like... YES I WANT CHANGE but thats all they listen to... they want change but not sure what change they want... just something else.

if the Democrats had a strong nominee they would have this election in the bag, but the bitching and type of mud-slinging that went on between Obama and Hilary... please

oh and if Hilary goes VP with Obama... 100% they will not win.

[prasamin]

We need a drastic change in the United States. Obama may be the one to bring that. Plus, we need to exterminate stupidity and ignorance, which only a minority candidate can realize and try to accomplish.